I can see where op could've been sold in the scope in the description where they directly mention airgun use. With that optic's msrp I might buy some eagle rings tonight, or search for potential install errors that could've lead to this.One that has at least double the elevation, no one scope specific, plenty of options. 90moa would be good start.
Anything is possible, but I believe it's the 30moa and that scope combo. He also didn't say what king he has, shooting slugs etc.I can see where op could've been sold in the scope in the description where they directly mention airgun use. With that optic's msrp I might buy some eagle rings tonight, or search for potential install errors that could've lead to this.
I have a 15 yard indoor range and can dial that on all of my scopes from expensive to trash(all sorts of tube size limitations) , tilted or not, long range gun or not. I'm wondering if there's not something overlooked contributing to this?
I figure if I can get trash to run, it's gotta be a fluke.
I did in fact do as you described. I took the Meopta off of the AA and put it on the FX, and put the Leupold from the FX on the AA. Both guns are happy now shooting nice tiny little groups...but the AA is still shooting smaller groups at 25yds than the FX. In defense of the FX, I still have not found it's very favorite ammo yet. The AA only shoots those tiny groups with 16gr and 18gr JSB's. At 50yds however, the FX puts the AA to shame and even bested my Anschutz 22lr.If I'm reading this correctly, for your testing, you switched to a different gun (AA) to test the new scope (Leupold), not a different scope (Meopta) on the same gun (FX). What you should have done was put the Meopta on the FX to see if the same zeroing issue exists. I believe the FX has built in MOA cant on the rail, thus reducing the amount of elevation you have for short distance. I believe that is your issue. My apologies if I'm wrong.
EDIT: I type slow. The previous posters summed up what I was trying to say.
And what scope would that be, may I ask?My King is zeroed @ 50 with minus 20moa, but my scope has 130 moa, so I got plenty of headroom.
Yep, but luckily I was able to play musical scopes and get the problem solved.He got the wrong scope for that gun.
The picatinny rail on the king has a slope forward built-in, so at a 100y, it gives you 30moa. Great for longer range.I don't know what that means. Please explain.
Good to hear and it didn't cost you anymore money.Yep, but luckily I was able to play musical scopes and get the problem solved.
I don't know what that means. Please explain.
March-FX 5-42x56mm Gen II. You can get plenty of scopes that has the same amount of adjustment for a heck lot less.And what scope would that be, may I ask?
I’m wondering exactly what type of rings he is usingConfirm that you used two rings of the same height.
I'm a fan of busy, my favorite is the Christmas tree element one because I can read wind and do whatever I need with it. It's a polluted view tho.Also a simple reticle that has holdover. Some are way to busy.
Considering that the rings were $20 UTG's, it would be a good idea to actually measure them. But since my problem was resolved by playing musical scopes, no need to do that now.Confirm that you used two rings of the same height.
They directly marketed towards airguns too unfortunately. I've had weaver mounting issues cause problems before where I overlooked an incomplete seating or locating block got caught up (3 rails look the same but aren't technically the same picatinny/weaver/nato).Definitely could be user error and not having enough travel on that scope. On my king shooting 50y, I have to dail down 20moa from factory zero shooting slugs. If he's shooting pellets, there should be some meat left on the bone...
I've been shooting since about the year 2k and this is the first time I've encountered this particular problem. You are mostly correct, I bought the scope because I wanted to be able to focus to 10yds, and I wanted Leupold glass. The reticle I actually wanted was the Boone and Crocket, but Leupold's with that reticle only have parallax correction down to 50yds. So I decided to give this model a try. I never saw this problem coming. BTW-the glass on this scope is far better than my Meopta Optika 5(I've never used any of the higher priced Meoptas so I still wonder if they use better glass on their higher end models), but the reticle on the Meopta is just right for my shooting needs.I can see where op could've been sold in the scope in the description where they directly mention airgun use. With that optic's msrp I might buy some eagle rings tonight, or search for potential install errors that could've lead to this.
I have a 15 yard indoor range and can dial that on all of my scopes from expensive to trash(all sorts of tube size limitations) , tilted or not, long range gun or not. I'm wondering if there's not something overlooked contributing to this?
I figure if I can get trash to run, it's gotta be a fluke.