I agree with you Rj but yes, I've actually had more that were uneven than even in bore diameter.... mostly LWs. It was explained to me many years ago that some of the Brit makers had spec'd it that way .... higher velocity was the justification , iirc. Many of the test barrels in 25 for the ART project were that way and I even asked Frank Walther himself why.... but he always sidestepped the question. I've purchased a good number of blanks for myself and never had a single one that was like that so it HAS to be spec'd or the result of some particular step in the fitting prep. Frank guaranteed a manufacturing tolerance of only .2% iirc which is so far beyond the pellet tolerances it isn't worth considering so it isn't in the bore and rifling process. The testing we did was about rifling profiles, bore size and choke. The barrels we felt were best and ended being one of the production models had even medium bore and soft choke. The choice by others of the team was a tight bore, tight-loose-tight , and heavy choke. Both shot well w the 25.4s at 100 but our choice also would shoot the 33.4s and Baracudas and several slugs.... all very well.
Back to the OP, since it appears to be a tight-loose-tight barrel, I would do some work to soften the leade and port edges and see what that accomplished. If you don't feel inclined to do that, a call to your dealer or AOA might prove beneficial. Seems like you've at least found 1 pellet that's respectable .
Back to the OP, since it appears to be a tight-loose-tight barrel, I would do some work to soften the leade and port edges and see what that accomplished. If you don't feel inclined to do that, a call to your dealer or AOA might prove beneficial. Seems like you've at least found 1 pellet that's respectable .
Upvote 0