For best accuracy, do you guys prefer your trigger break to have minimal trigger over-travel, or lots of over-travel after it breaks?
My school of thought used to be that one needed some over-travel(some even argue lots of over-travel is good) after the break so as to minimize the potential trigger impact of the shot due to lock time and the bullet traveling down the barrel. But given what I saw with the latest generation of long range precision shooters, I may have to change my mind.
Of all the triggers I have (FX, Timney, Geissele, TriggerTech), the TriggerTech’s frictionless trigger felt the best - almost zero over-travel. It also happens to be the most popular trigger being used by the long range precision competitors who shoot out to 1000/2000/3000 yards - powder burners of course.
So, do you guys prefer minimal over-travel, or lots of over-travel?
My school of thought used to be that one needed some over-travel(some even argue lots of over-travel is good) after the break so as to minimize the potential trigger impact of the shot due to lock time and the bullet traveling down the barrel. But given what I saw with the latest generation of long range precision shooters, I may have to change my mind.
Of all the triggers I have (FX, Timney, Geissele, TriggerTech), the TriggerTech’s frictionless trigger felt the best - almost zero over-travel. It also happens to be the most popular trigger being used by the long range precision competitors who shoot out to 1000/2000/3000 yards - powder burners of course.
So, do you guys prefer minimal over-travel, or lots of over-travel?