Selling and sending a stole rifle through the mail could constitute Mail Fraud and should be reported to your Post Master.
Upvote 0
The seller has a responsibility to ensure the product reaches the buyer - lots of risk - that’s why as responsible sellers we pack our stuff very well, we ship through legitimate carriers who will insure us against loss and require signatures upon receipt! When buyers or sellers “cheap out” on packing, shipping or insurance there is always a chance for major loss.So... Kdog refunded you...and ate the rifle. To make things right with you....and you alone. when he infact did not have to. At all not one bit... He didn't owe you a thing. Correct! That is definitely a Stand up guy..!!! Now that you know the truth "know the truth" and that it is infact his rifle... Your waiting on eBay and PayPal to decide on a refund... So let's say... The eBay/PayPal thing doesn't work out... Who's gonna be the stand up guy?
I disagree. The seller who acts in good faith, packs well, and uses a responsible shipping method performed their due diligence. We're talking about forum members and private people who are not businesses which can accept business losses. If a buyer declines to pay for insurance, especially in todays environment regarding shipping losses, how can you blame a seller?I don’t see it that way. If I buy an item from you I am your customer and there is some sort of agreement or contract implied you will get the item to me. If the shipper (that you are a customer to…with same agreement/contract ) loses it that isn’t my fault. It’s up to you the seller to make good with me. When it comes to reimbursement from a shipper that reimbursement goes to the person that sent it not that was supposed to get it as the receiver isn’t their customer the person that shipped it is. So it’s the responsibility of the seller to make it right with the buyer irregardless. They owe it to them. As it’s the responsibility of the shipping company to make it right with their customer who paid the bill to send it. This is why I never agree when sellers want extra money to insure something. The responsibility is on you not the buyer you should just do it as sound business practice. I don’t know maybe I’m crazy but this is how I see it and I hope my explanation attempt made sense.
I get what you are saying as there is no legal obligation or such. I personally would feel compelled to do what this seller did for the OP. That’s just me. I have been through this once awhile back with a compound bow with fedex ground. I sold it and fedex damaged part of it. They wouldn’t deal with the guy that received it. I had to file the claim and do everything. The first thing they wanted ( so everyone knows this) were pics of the item/damage and pics showing the packaging. Shippers are quick to deny claims based on inadequate packing. So over pack your stuff. I had packed it really well. They also wanted some type of proof of the Value of the replacement and repair cost of the item. In the meantime I sent the guy the money for new limbs. It took fedex a little while but they did rule in my favor and sent me a check. Now I don’t know if every shipper is the same but that is how it worked with fedex. They would only deal with me as the service contract was between me and them not the buyer. It’s a weird situation involving a third party shipper and responsibility associated with that. I just feel the ultimate obligation is on the seller. I always insure shipments for value for this reason. It’s really weird that no reimbursement was given at all for a lost shipment. Shipments usually come with some basic coverage like 100 dollars. I can guarantee I would never in a million years use that shipping company again if I were that seller. I won’t use usps. Their tracking sucks as does their service. Overall they have the worst service in the industry. I work for a competitor so possibly they lie to us about those stats lol but my experience with the post office has reflected those stats. I actually use pirate ship and let’s just say I don’t work for that for that shipping company eitherI disagree. The seller who acts in good faith, packs well, and uses a responsible shipping method performed their due diligence. We're talking about forum members and private people who are not businesses which can accept business losses. If a buyer declines to pay for insurance, especially in todays environment regarding shipping losses, how can you blame a seller?
Now if an item arrives damaged due to shoddy packaging, then there is a problem, not withstanding obvious package mishandling.
When I buy here off the forum, if the seller doesn't mention insurance, I'll ask to see if it is covered in the shipping charge. If not, I'll gladly pay a little more for peace of mind.
I see your point... But now you are in possession of a stolen item... And you know it...(and admitted it on this forum as well to eBay and PayPal) you didn't know it was the stolen rifle when you purchased it on eBay... But now you sure do and can prove it was infact a stolen rifle...So keeping it from the rightful owner is the right thing to do?? Help me understand this.. either way.. I'm glad a stolen item was recovered.. I hope this ends well for both you guys....more importantly I hope the person that stole it in the first place get what they deserve..The seller has a responsibility to ensure the product reaches the buyer - lots of risk - that’s why as responsible sellers we pack our stuff very well, we ship through legitimate carriers who will insure us against loss and require signatures upon receipt! When buyers or sellers “cheap out” on packing, shipping or insurance there is always a chance for major loss.
There are a multitude of issues you are unaware of - please don’t make assumptions - thank you.I see your point... But now you are in possession of a stolen item... And you know it...(and admitted it on this forum as well to eBay and PayPal) you didn't know it was the stolen rifle when you purchased it on eBay... But now you sure do and can prove it was infact a stolen rifle...So keeping it from the rightful owner is the right thing to do?? Help me understand this.. either way.. I'm glad a stolen item was recovered.. I hope this ends well for both you guys....more importantly I hope the person that stole it in the first place get what they deserve..
Are you saying items 1,2,and 3 have taken place already? I have not read that information here anywhere.Hate to bring this up, but here we go.
1. Buyers (Cavedweller) is refunded money.
2. Seller files claim with USPS.
3. USPS pays Seller for claim
Rifle is now USPS Property being that they paid for it. Shows up on EBAY, Cavedweller re-purchases it and receives - "Stolen Property".
If USPS never filed/payed a claim than, it's probably legally the original seller. Once Cavedweller gets refunded his money from Paypal, he should pay the original seller.
IMHO
Smitty
Lol. I hear you. I will just make a prediction. Neither eBay or PayPal will want anything to do with any of this and will just refer complaint filer to contact authorities.Are you saying items 1,2,and 3 have taken place already? I have not read that information here anywhere.
From what I read the original owner from whom it was stolen had not been reimbursed and was out the money he had graciously reimbursed to the buyer.
Gentlemen, I recommend we convene these proceedings until tomorrow evening. (I gotta call it a day.) It is a pleasure litigating this case with you fine gentlemen and I look forward to tomorrow’s discourse. If there is any further exculpatory evidence that needs presented please have it ready.
Hahaha I’m not making anyone out to be a “bad person”. Good people mistakenly buy stolen property all the time. It doesn’t change the fact that it’s stolen property and that it has a rightful owner.I can't believe there are so many people here making you the bad person with stolen merchandise, you did nothing wrong , the broken legal system is showing even here with these members attitudes, let us know what happens with the thief. I had something simular happen to me many years ago and i researched addresses near the culprit and he was definitely a low life.
The issue is with proving the seller had knowledge it was stolen. Most sellers, unless they are part of law enforcement and sell as a side gig, don't have access to law enforcement data. Not to mention, if the original owner didn't file a report or know the serial number, the gun in essence is akin to every other Huffy bicycle being stolen and sold daily.Selling and sending a stole rifle through the mail could constitute Mail Fraud and should be reported to your Post Master.
People !Hate to bring this up, but here we go.
1. Buyers (Cavedweller) is refunded money.
2. Seller files claim with USPS.
3. USPS pays Seller for claim
Rifle is now USPS Property being that they paid for it. Shows up on EBAY, Cavedweller re-purchases it and receives - "Stolen Property".
If USPS never filed/payed a claim than, it's probably legally the original seller. Once Cavedweller gets refunded his money from Paypal, he should pay the original seller.
IMHO
Smitty