- The AGN App is ready! Search "Airgun Nation" in your App store. To compliment this new tech we've assigned the "Threads" Feed & "Dark" Mode. To revert back click HERE.
The next version of Fx Impact will be ????????????????
- Thread starter Spider92
- Start date
Upvote 0
It will be the same as the previous impacts but cost more with bigger gauges, bigger plenum and a longer supercalifragilistexpialidoious liner system
Bb
Bb
Upvote 0
Super Secret Project.
The rumblings are there, but everyone in the know has taken a blood oath to reveal NADA so far.
The rumblings are there, but everyone in the know has taken a blood oath to reveal NADA so far.
Upvote 0
They will some what “ fix” the shortcomings on the current model, on the new model, and create more ,new problems on the new model . Never ending cycle, and it keeps people buying the “ new models”, no body’s ever noticed this ? Obviously their( blinders on) marketing is working too. Oh yea and they will have a 65 “ + only 6” more with a moderator, bull pup. Lol
Upvote 0
Most likely double deep impact, crank up the power and the price ! Penetration don’t come cheap.
Upvote 0
How about a barrel that does not shift in the receiver changing the POI. Wouldn't that be nice!
Upvote 0
Semi-auto good, full-auto not good (unless your talking about low power replica plinkers). Full-auto big bores will bring too much attention/trouble/regulations to the industry.
Upvote 0
While I’ve never fired an FX, I know that they use very light hammers. In my opinion one of the big advantages of going hammerless would be reduced shot vibration/lock time, but wonder how much better it would be than a conventional system with a 7g or whatever it is hammer
Upvote 0
I don't own an FX, but just a note to all airgun manufacturers.
Not ALL airgun users want to "tinker" with their gun. Many of us consider it to simply be a tool. At tool which we want to work, reliably, consistently and without hassle for years.
When problems do occur, we want them to be easily fixed without having to send the tool back to the manufacturer to get it done. The user should be able to easily fix most problems that occur with parts that are likely to wear out.
Again, for many people who use air guns, it is just a tool. The one that works the most reliably, consistently and without problems for the longest time wins.
If you don't fall into this category of airgun users, fine. There are already myriad choices for you. (smile)
Many of us would simply like an airgun that works without having to tweak it all the time! Simple as a hammer. (grin)
Not ALL airgun users want to "tinker" with their gun. Many of us consider it to simply be a tool. At tool which we want to work, reliably, consistently and without hassle for years.
When problems do occur, we want them to be easily fixed without having to send the tool back to the manufacturer to get it done. The user should be able to easily fix most problems that occur with parts that are likely to wear out.
Again, for many people who use air guns, it is just a tool. The one that works the most reliably, consistently and without problems for the longest time wins.
If you don't fall into this category of airgun users, fine. There are already myriad choices for you. (smile)
Many of us would simply like an airgun that works without having to tweak it all the time! Simple as a hammer. (grin)
Upvote 0
What you say is absolutely correct. But that is not the reason why manufacturers cannot do it. The reason is technology.
Upvote 0