Taipan, cricket
- Thread starter Ranin
- Start date
Yo creo que estaría contento con cualquiera de las dos. Mi Cricket .25 produce 62fpe i es extremadamente precisa. El gatillo es muy bueno, aunque el del Taipan es excelente. El Taipan también tiene sistema que previene doble carga.
Yo tengo el Taipan en .22 i el Cricket en .25. So no puedo comparar exactamente, pero me da para tener una opinión.
Buena suerte
Yo tengo el Taipan en .22 i el Cricket en .25. So no puedo comparar exactamente, pero me da para tener una opinión.
Buena suerte
Upvote 0
translation:
I believe you will be happy with whichever of the two you choose. My Cricket .25 produces 62 fpe and is very accurate The trigger is very good, although the one in the Taipan is excellent too. The Taipan also has a system that prevents double loading.
I have a Taipen in .22 and the Cricket in .25. So I am not able to compare them exactly, so I can't have an opinion.
Good luck
I believe you will be happy with whichever of the two you choose. My Cricket .25 produces 62 fpe and is very accurate The trigger is very good, although the one in the Taipan is excellent too. The Taipan also has a system that prevents double loading.
I have a Taipen in .22 and the Cricket in .25. So I am not able to compare them exactly, so I can't have an opinion.
Good luck
Upvote 0
I have a Taipan in .22 and the Cricket in .25. So I am not able to compare them exactly, But it gives me (enough if you will) TO HAVE an opinion.
Upvote 0
I also have a Cricket in .25 and a Taipan Veteran long in .22.
They are both excellent guns but I prefer the Veteran mainly because it's a. 22 and very quiet. It really does all I need in an airgun but I like the .25 for the power if and when I need it. My Cricket is powertuned and I am currently experimenting with slugs in it.
Both brands are very reliable, very accurate and smooth operating with great triggers and get good shot counts. I like the skeleton stock (aesthetics) on my Cricket better than the Veterans blocky stock but they both fit good to the shoulder.
If I had to keep one it would be the Veteran.
They are both excellent guns but I prefer the Veteran mainly because it's a. 22 and very quiet. It really does all I need in an airgun but I like the .25 for the power if and when I need it. My Cricket is powertuned and I am currently experimenting with slugs in it.
Both brands are very reliable, very accurate and smooth operating with great triggers and get good shot counts. I like the skeleton stock (aesthetics) on my Cricket better than the Veterans blocky stock but they both fit good to the shoulder.
If I had to keep one it would be the Veteran.
Upvote 0
When i was at RMAC, I tried a taipan veteran in .25 and it was a very very nice gun. The trigger was so good. The cocking was butter smooth and was really accurate. One thing I didnt understand was no buddy was using this gun to compete. The gun I tried was a shooter's backup gun for his. 30 bobcat if that tells you anything
Upvote 0
In comparison to the Taipan, the Cricket is:
● 1.2" shorter
● the newer model finally has a safety switch (around the air tube, above the trigger), however its function I cannot discern from the photos
● 12cc less air, but at 300bar -- therefore the Cricket probably has more shots per fill (Taipan 250bar)!
● 0.3lbs heavier
● 14 shots per mag in .22 (Taipan only 10 shots in .22)
● I read that inserting the magazine into the gun is somehow complicated, non-intuitive
● Available in synthetic (makes it a tougher gun)
● (the Tapian has a 20moa rail)
Happy shopping!!
Matthias
=======================================
En comparación con el Taipan, el Cricket es:
● 3.1cm más corto
● el nuevo modelo del Cricket por fin tiene su seguro (en el tubo de aire, encima del gatillo), solamente me falta entender cómo funcciona (las fotos no son claros)
● 12cc menos aire, pero el aire llega hasta 300bar -- por eso el Cricket probablemente tiene más tiros por carga (Taipan 250bar)!
● 136 grams más peso
● 14 tiros en el cargados en .22 (Taipan solamente tiene 10 tiros en .22)
● He leído que insertar el cargador al rifles es un poco complicado, require varios pasos, no es intuivito
● Disponible también en sintético (mucho más duro que madera)
● (el Tapian tiene un 20moa rail)
Que te vayan bien tus compras...!!
Matthias
● 1.2" shorter
● the newer model finally has a safety switch (around the air tube, above the trigger), however its function I cannot discern from the photos
● 12cc less air, but at 300bar -- therefore the Cricket probably has more shots per fill (Taipan 250bar)!
● 0.3lbs heavier
● 14 shots per mag in .22 (Taipan only 10 shots in .22)
● I read that inserting the magazine into the gun is somehow complicated, non-intuitive
● Available in synthetic (makes it a tougher gun)
● (the Tapian has a 20moa rail)
Happy shopping!!
Matthias
=======================================
En comparación con el Taipan, el Cricket es:
● 3.1cm más corto
● el nuevo modelo del Cricket por fin tiene su seguro (en el tubo de aire, encima del gatillo), solamente me falta entender cómo funcciona (las fotos no son claros)
● 12cc menos aire, pero el aire llega hasta 300bar -- por eso el Cricket probablemente tiene más tiros por carga (Taipan 250bar)!
● 136 grams más peso
● 14 tiros en el cargados en .22 (Taipan solamente tiene 10 tiros en .22)
● He leído que insertar el cargador al rifles es un poco complicado, require varios pasos, no es intuivito
● Disponible también en sintético (mucho más duro que madera)
● (el Tapian tiene un 20moa rail)
Que te vayan bien tus compras...!!
Matthias
Upvote 0