Sporter Stock For A FWB 300

The FWB300 already has the sporter stock. The later 300s are the target stocked versions.

If you seek a light weight hunting and carry rifle then the $135 on sale Benjamin Maximus at MidwayUSA Is what I would buy and a cheap $40-$50 hand pump with filter. You be surprised how accurate this $135 PCP is. It's only five pounds and comes with a 5 year warranty. One of my all time favorite guns regardless of cheapness and I also own mostly all of the top of the line guns as well and actually shoot my Maximus the most. I used to shoot my FWB300s the most but the Maximus took over because it's extremely lighter and more accurate than the 300s past 60 yards and 2 inch spinner target capable repeatably at 100 yards.
 
You need to find an earlier 150. This is one i sold a few years ago. Shoulda kept it!

Screenshot_20190227-230758.1606617332.png


IMG_20160209_195537104.1606617261.jpg

 
An excellent question! There is a good FWB 300 discussion group on Facebook, where Scott Pilkington recently put up the image below. The gun on the left is a 300S action, placed into a gorgeous custom stock obviously designed to match the center fire beauty on the right (both of 'em lefties, too). So you aren't the first to ask, LOL - I've wondered why FWB didn't do something like this themselves.

BD03833A-A550-4BFC-8595-1C4D4BBD60F0.1606659150.jpeg


As you can see from the posts above, the earlier models 150 and 300 had a stock fore end that was shallower than on the 300S. I have a 300, and while I love the lines of it, calling it a "sporter" stock is a misnomer - this was just the match rifles style of the day (300 was made about 1969 to '72). The fore end is longer than the 300S, and slightly wider - you will not forget you have a heavy match rifle in your hands.

A major factor in how the 300S handles is the barrel weight. Contrary to appearances, this is not a separate piece on the end of the barrel, but a full-length sleeve that is fatter at the end - the actual barrel is only 15 mm in diameter. It was a factory option, so there are guns out there without one, and you may find this is the key to your question. You can't shave 3 pounds off the gun by changing the wood, but taking off that extra pound so far in front of your hands make a HUGE difference in its balance and overall handling.

My current favorite FWB shooter is this one - a Junior ("Mini") action in a 300SL stock. The Junior has a shorter barrel with no sleeve, and the "L" stock is similar to the basic "Match" model of the day, but with a longer fore end and extensive stippling. It's still no R7 in the handling department, but a lot more "sporter-y" than my other 300's for sure.

898F2EA6-1492-4803-96AF-870D18A94879.1606659876.jpeg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Steve Milbocker
@MDriskill, thanks for the photos. My gun is a 300 (no S). I recently put a new buffer and breech seal in it plus I went over the entire rifle. It's in such fine condition that it looks new and it makes me smile every time I take it out. The Junior "mini" looks interesting. I guess what I'm after most is a better handling version of what I have now so that photo of the 300 that Scott Pilkington took is very tantalizing.
 
@MDriskill, thanks for the photos. My gun is a 300 (no S). I recently put a new buffer and breech seal in it plus I went over the entire rifle. It's in such fine condition that it looks new and it makes me smile every time I take it out. The Junior "mini" looks interesting. I guess what I'm after most is a better handling version of what I have now so that photo of the 300 that Scott Pilkington took is very tantalizing.

I neglected to mention my 300 has a barrel sleeve that is not permanently fixed (typically these were epoxied in place). Remove the front sight and it slides right off, making it easy to compare-and-contrast both setups. The 300's barrel is also a little longer than either the 150 or 300S, which does not contribute to a "sporter" feel though. 

A slimmer stock would definitely be nice but again, the key to getting significant weight off the gun is the barrel sleeve. To me, the closest thing to a 300S "sporter," short of custom work, is the Mini. Putting an extra buttplate spacer or two will match the pull dimension of the "adult" stock variants of course. (I stuck the "L" stock on mine just cuz I like the look, LOL - it's not at all a functional necessity.)
 
An excellent question! There is a good FWB 300 discussion group on Facebook, where Scott Pilkington recently put up the image below. The gun on the left is a 300S action, placed into a gorgeous custom stock obviously designed to match the center fire beauty on the right. So you aren't the first to ask the question, LOL. I've wondered why FWB didn't do something like this themselves.

BD03833A-A550-4BFC-8595-1C4D4BBD60F0.1606659150.jpeg


<snip>

I believe that 300S was on GunTrader a while back. I was tempted, even though the stock is a for a lefty.
 
I just weighed my L stock and it was 2lbs 12oz, not sure what the wood is but don't think it's walnut.



My guess is that FWB never intended these rifles to be used as sporters, but they do a great job at what they were designed for.

AFAIK, all "L" stocks are European walnut - including yours, based on the pics you posted.

European walnut (juglans regia; aka English, Persian, Carpathian, or Madeira walnut) is quite different in appearance than North American black walnut (juglans nigra) though - lighter in color, often a warm orange-y tone. Grain patterning can range anywhere from non-existent to exhibition-grade. Walnut is typically quite a bit lighter in weight than beech BTW. 
 
An excellent question! There is a good FWB 300 discussion group on Facebook, where Scott Pilkington recently put up the image below. The gun on the left is a 300S action, placed into a gorgeous custom stock obviously designed to match the center fire beauty on the right (both of 'em lefties, too). So you aren't the first to ask, LOL - I've wondered why FWB didn't do something like this themselves.

BD03833A-A550-4BFC-8595-1C4D4BBD60F0.1606659150.jpeg


As you can see from the posts above, the earlier models 150 and 300 had a stock fore end that was shallower than on the 300S. I have a 300, and while I love the lines of it, to be honest I would not really call it a "sporter" stock. The fore end is longer than the 300S, and actually slightly wider. When you pick one up, you definitely don't forget you have a heavy match rifle in your hands.

A major factor in how the 300S handles is the barrel weight. Contrary to appearances, this is not a separate piece on the end of the barrel, but a full-length sleeve that is fatter at the end - the actual barrel is only 15 mm in diameter. The sleeve was a factory option, so there are guns out there without one, and not having that weight out there so far in front of your hands makes a HUGE difference. You may find this is the key to your question; you aren't going to shave 3 pounds off the gun by changing the wood.

My current favorite FWB shooter is this one - a Junior ("Mini") action in a 300SL stock. The Junior has a shorter barrel with no sleeve, and the "L" stock is similar to the basic "Match" model of the day, but with a longer fore end and extensive stippling. It's still no R7 in the handling department, but a lot more "sporter-y" than my other 300's for sure.

898F2EA6-1492-4803-96AF-870D18A94879.1606659876.jpeg



I actually sent Scott P an email and he responded. The 300S in the photo cost him 2 grand and he felt lucky to get it so cheap. Estimates that in today market such a piece may cost between (are you ready for this?) 8 thousand and 10 thousand dollars.😱 Yikes!
 
I actually sent Scott P an email and he responded. The 300S in the photo cost him 2 grand and he felt lucky to get it so cheap. Estimates that in today market such a piece may cost between (are you ready for this?) 8 thousand and 10 thousand dollars.
1f631.svg
Yikes!

Thanks for the follow up, most interesting!

At a time when high-condition 300's in special-edition factory wood (RT's, Tyros, etc.) are crossing into 4-figure prices, I would absolutely agree that $2K is a steal for a piece like that. Wow what a beauty it is...
 
An excellent question! There is a good FWB 300 discussion group on Facebook, where Scott Pilkington recently put up the image below. The gun on the left is a 300S action, placed into a gorgeous custom stock obviously designed to match the center fire beauty on the right (both of 'em lefties, too). So you aren't the first to ask, LOL - I've wondered why FWB didn't do something like this themselves.



As you can see from the posts above, the earlier models 150 and 300 had a stock fore end that was shallower than on the 300S. I have a 300, and while I love the lines of it, to be honest I would not really call it a "sporter" stock. The fore end is longer than the 300S, and actually slightly wider. When you pick one up, you definitely don't forget you have a heavy match rifle in your hands.

A major factor in how the 300S handles is the barrel weight. Contrary to appearances, this is not a separate piece on the end of the barrel, but a full-length sleeve that is fatter at the end - the actual barrel is only 15 mm in diameter. The sleeve was a factory option, so there are guns out there without one, and not having that weight out there so far in front of your hands makes a HUGE difference. You may find this is the key to your question; you aren't going to shave 3 pounds off the gun by changing the wood.

My current favorite FWB shooter is this one - a Junior ("Mini") action in a 300SL stock. The Junior has a shorter barrel with no sleeve, and the "L" stock is similar to the basic "Match" model of the day, but with a longer fore end and extensive stippling. It's still no R7 in the handling department, but a lot more "sporter-y" than my other 300's for sure.

898F2EA6-1492-4803-96AF-870D18A94879.1606659876.jpeg



Below is an example of a 300S rifle in a factory long stock and no barrel sleeve. 

1982Lside.1606860745.JPG
1982Lsides.1606860746.JPG
1982 sight.1606860744.JPG


A few weight comparisons below.

1982 300S Long stock _ 9.8 lbs

1982L.1606860909.JPG


300S Junior Model _ 9.2 lbs

Mini.1606860991.JPG


The heavy weight is a dressed up Model 300SU _10.4 lbs

300SU.1606861127.JPG


Below are weights of bare stocks.

Model 150 stock _ 2.2 lbs

150.1606861269.JPG


Model 300 stock _ 2.4 lbs

300.1606861326.JPG


Model 300S stock _ 2.4 lbs

300S.1606861388.JPG


Another Sporter Stock option may be to find an old 300 stock, get the sander out and thin it down. Then drop in a sleeveless barrel and action. That combo may get the rig under 8 1/2 lbs. Still not light.

MDriskill, Did the long stippled 300S Match stocks ever run simultaneously with the shorter match stocks?

Steven




 
An excellent question! There is a good FWB 300 discussion group on Facebook, where Scott Pilkington recently put up the image below. The gun on the left is a 300S action, placed into a gorgeous custom stock obviously designed to match the center fire beauty on the right (both of 'em lefties, too). So you aren't the first to ask, LOL - I've wondered why FWB didn't do something like this themselves.



As you can see from the posts above, the earlier models 150 and 300 had a stock fore end that was shallower than on the 300S. I have a 300, and while I love the lines of it, to be honest I would not really call it a "sporter" stock. The fore end is longer than the 300S, and actually slightly wider. When you pick one up, you definitely don't forget you have a heavy match rifle in your hands.

A major factor in how the 300S handles is the barrel weight. Contrary to appearances, this is not a separate piece on the end of the barrel, but a full-length sleeve that is fatter at the end - the actual barrel is only 15 mm in diameter. The sleeve was a factory option, so there are guns out there without one, and not having that weight out there so far in front of your hands makes a HUGE difference. You may find this is the key to your question; you aren't going to shave 3 pounds off the gun by changing the wood.

My current favorite FWB shooter is this one - a Junior ("Mini") action in a 300SL stock. The Junior has a shorter barrel with no sleeve, and the "L" stock is similar to the basic "Match" model of the day, but with a longer fore end and extensive stippling. It's still no R7 in the handling department, but a lot more "sporter-y" than my other 300's for sure.

898F2EA6-1492-4803-96AF-870D18A94879.1606659876.jpeg



Below is an example of a 300S rifle in a factory long stock and no barrel sleeve. 

1982Lside.1606860745.JPG
1982Lsides.1606860746.JPG
1982 sight.1606860744.JPG


A few weight comparisons below.

1982 300S Long stock _ 9.8 lbs

1982L.1606860909.JPG


300S Junior Model _ 9.2 lbs

Mini.1606860991.JPG


The heavy weight is a dressed up Model 300SU _10.4 lbs

300SU.1606861127.JPG


Below are weights of bare stocks.

Model 150 stock _ 2.2 lbs

150.1606861269.JPG


Model 300 stock _ 2.4 lbs

300.1606861326.JPG


Model 300S stock _ 2.4 lbs

300S.1606861388.JPG


Another Sporter Stock option may be to find an old 300 stock, get the sander out and thin it down. Then drop in a sleeveless barrel and action. That combo may get the rig under 8 1/2 lbs. Still not light.

MDriskill, Did the long stippled 300S Match stocks ever run simultaneously with the shorter match stocks?

Steven




Great info Steven - many thanks for your reply. I might try to get a beater stock and "play" with it a bit.



Bill
 
Wadcutter Steven - wow, what an awesome post! Many thanks, am sticking that one in my reference file for sure.

The long stippled stock was a special edition called the "300S Match L," that was produced in parallel with the standard Match model. The L was intended as a companion practice piece for the then-new FWB 2000 rimfire match rifle, with very similar stock details. I think Beeman imported quite a few L's though, they seem to turn up fairly often.

The profile of the L stock is pretty much identical to the second-generation 300S Universal, but of course omits the interchangeable cheekpieces and sight risers. It's also very similar to the regular Match of the day, adding only the extended fore end and stippling.