Sightron S-tac ?

I've ordered a Sightron S-Tac 4-20 FFP moa for the Epic Two, as it's much lighter than what's on there and has some positive remarks on the net.
But I would like to know if anyone on here uses/used them and what they thought?

I really don't go past 100 yards (yet) so I'm really just after light and clear optics.
One of the best bangs for the buck in optics Especially when you find them on sale at 5-600$ Clear glass,( not top tier but very good for the price range) I personally like the reticles because they’re not overly cluttered and are illuminated And do a decent job at ranging with the Parralax.
Joe
 
I've ordered a Sightron S-Tac 4-20 FFP moa for the Epic Two, as it's much lighter than what's on there and has some positive remarks on the net.
But I would like to know if anyone on here uses/used them and what they thought?

I really don't go past 100 yards (yet) so I'm really just after light and clear optics.
@MACTEN There are several S-Tac models available. Which one do you have?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MACTEN
@Ma
I got the FFP 4-20x50 illuminated wit the moa reticle. exposed turrets.
@MACTEN They are good scopes in my experience. I have that one, but havent used it. I also have it in SFP with an MOA-2 reticle. . I like it other than the fact that I’ve moved away from SFP scopes for the time being. Good reticle, pretty good glass for the price point. The build quality feels good. I had my SFP mounted on a Brocock Bantam Sniper for a while. There are a decent amount of threads on these scopes. Here’s one that may be useful to you.


The main compliants I’ve read about them are thin reticle complaints and the reticle being too small to use at lower magnifications.
 
I've ordered a Sightron S-Tac 4-20 FFP moa for the Epic Two, as it's much lighter than what's on there and has some positive remarks on the net.
But I would like to know if anyone on here uses/used them and what they thought?

I really don't go past 100 yards (yet) so I'm really just after light and clear optics.
Both mrad and Moa versions are nice. Made in the phillipines but fully supported by Sightron 🇺🇸
IMG_9434.jpeg
 
@Ma

@MACTEN They are good scopes in my experience. I have that one, but havent used it. I also have it in SFP with an MOA-2 reticle. . I like it other than the fact that I’ve moved away from SFP scopes for the time being. Good reticle, pretty good glass for the price point. The build quality feels good. I had my SFP mounted on a Brocock Bantam Sniper for a while. There are a decent amount of threads on these scopes. Here’s one that may be useful to you.


The main compliants I’ve read about them are thin reticle complaints and the reticle being too small to use at lower magnifications.


@MACTEN I forgot to mention that my scopes are primarily for hunting and my main complaint about Sightron S-Tac scopes is the lack of numbered markings on the parallax knob. There are no numbers. I hate that about them.
 
I have been tempted several times to buy this scope.

But looking at the specs, I was always taken aback by the comparatively low FoV at the bottom magnification.....
Only 22ft at 4x....
(Some 6-24x have a wider FoV.)

4-20x usually have a wider FoV than the Sightrons at 4x:
32ft (Swampfox Warhawk)
28ft (Athlon Helos + Heras | HiLux | Hawke Frontier | Vector Paragon)

For rushed close range shots — I feel I need around 30ft of FoV at min. mag.

Matthias