New rifle, soonly a new scope, and FX No limits rings.
With my Marauder I was using Sportsmatch adadjustable rings with a Hawke sidewinder 30. I basically just used the adjustment to keep the scope happy and safe at my 60 yard zero, and not for use over 75 yards.
I moved the scope over to my new Crown, but used the FX No limits mounts.
As it's been too cold to do much shooting I didnt much care about using the adjustability of the mounts.
Today I ordered a Viper Pro and it occurred to me that I really need to get the scope height sorted out when I mount it.
Since I'll be using the mounts to do the gross elevation, I expect there to be enough difference in height between the ocular and objective to really mess up balastic calculators, especially at the longer ranges the rifle is capable of.
I can come up with a reason to measure at either end, and of course there is always the middle.
I'm too old to pull out any more hair thinking of this.
Recommendations and the reasoning behind them anyone?
With my Marauder I was using Sportsmatch adadjustable rings with a Hawke sidewinder 30. I basically just used the adjustment to keep the scope happy and safe at my 60 yard zero, and not for use over 75 yards.
I moved the scope over to my new Crown, but used the FX No limits mounts.
As it's been too cold to do much shooting I didnt much care about using the adjustability of the mounts.
Today I ordered a Viper Pro and it occurred to me that I really need to get the scope height sorted out when I mount it.
Since I'll be using the mounts to do the gross elevation, I expect there to be enough difference in height between the ocular and objective to really mess up balastic calculators, especially at the longer ranges the rifle is capable of.
I can come up with a reason to measure at either end, and of course there is always the middle.
I'm too old to pull out any more hair thinking of this.
Recommendations and the reasoning behind them anyone?