From MikeVV:
I just swapped shrouds (still had to use the sticky rubber sheet) from the full sized Prophet to the Compact to see if the extra volume does anything.
Not a ton, but notable. Still has the same "crack" to the sound, just not as loud.
So, maybe I can get away with a single segment of the Huma silencer rather than two or three segments, keeping the barrel short, like it's supposed to be. If I can get the disc off and modified.
Mike
P.S. – Yeah, have not verified the accuracy yet.
The underlined above is a REALLY odd thing to say..!
Most ALL of the high end guns are in a constant state of refinement. We are up to what…3x on the FX rifles…right ? That is…the "third" step in its refinement history.
Phones, computers, cars, trucks, "pellets"…! ALL have gone through refinements, and will continue to do so. Even in most cases, a completely new "thing" (rifle in this case!) will have learned improvements from the last model.
Are you driving a stock Model T as your daily driver ?
MIke
I don’t think so, like I said, I really like the rti, but why has it taken 3 revisions to finally scallop the side plates? That is a very straightforward and simple operation, to machine out a sharp edge. The longer cocking arm, well yeah, more leverage, but why wasn’t it considered on prototypes? Your forum questions on adding shroud spacers and modding the tube, aren’t these things that should be considered during testing? They are still operating off the priest platform, which is now like 4 years in? Remember, I like the simplicity and power and accuracy of the rti, the small refinements that should have been resolved and implemented take entirely too long. The impact is not a fair comparison because there was a lot of internal changes and barrel changes to the impact . You sound like a fanboy, better go get your iPhone 19. Hurry up and shell out your cash for the latest greatest.
