Reticle $

[johnwoitalla]

It seems illuminated reticles are all the rage nowadays. I suspect a lot of manufacturers are putting a lot of advertising $ into making the the illuminated reticles a major selling point on their scopes. For example, in looking at the choices for reticles with the Titan line of Element scopes at one major online retailer, there are no choices for non-illuminated reticles. That makes me wonder if the price jump from the Helix to the Titan level is really just selling bells and whistles and not really much of a jump in quality for an extra $300 to $400. I think Element makes decent scopes. But just like so many other manufacturers, they have to have multi levels of quality and ever bigger objectives and shiny glowing ultra busy Christmas trees!

 

[JaceSpace1369]

@johnwoitalla Vector Taurus 4-24x50 is a super clear scope, with a nice red dot on cloudy and overcast days, or when shooting in the dark. It has 6 settings with intermittent off click between each one. And it only illuminates the center dot.

 

[Uglyjohn]

As 90+% of my shooting is in dark wooded places, IR is a must have. Maybe an age related thing but loosing sight of the reticle on a dark target is beyond frustrating. Uj

 

[synergy4]

As 90+% of my shooting is in dark wooded places, IR is a must have. Maybe an age related thing but loosing sight of the reticle on a dark target is beyond frustrating. Uj

never thought about that, but have lost the cross hairs multiple times in the woods, and it takes a few seconds to reset to focus on the target again

 

[JimD]

Depends on how fine the reticle is to me. My Primary Arms 4-14 has a nice thick reticle and I have never wanted to illuminate it. My my Vector Veyron and Arken EPL-4 have fine reticles and IR is very nice to have for low light. The lens seem a little small on the Veyron but that is probably part of having a short light scope.