Removing Barrel Choke?

Not being familiar with the Pro Hunter slugs, I went to their site and looked a bit. What I found was slugs listed by cal. and weight. I must have missed sizes.

You see, they have to be no more than .0003" over the bore to work reasonably well. In most of my slug guns in the smaller cal's, they work best at .0001" under to .0001" over for beat accuracy. You simply cannot select a cal. and expect it to work.

It isn't that the barrels are slug fussy so much as folks are trying to shoot slugs without selecting or sizing to the bore or choke with the additional issue as to not understanding that the twist requirements are not weight, but rather the length of the projectile.



I would suggest going to a site such as the Colby Twist Calculator to see how close a given projectiles requirements in twist are to the slugs you are contemplating trying. Most AG barrels are to fast for most of the slugs in .25 for instance.



No, FX barrels are not fussy at all. Nick of NSA, maker of mighty fine slugs for airguns understands this, and has worked with FX to develop his slugs to be very accurate in them. First the correct dia. for the bores, and secondly, the overall length to best take advantage of the twist rates.



His latest slug in .25is almost identical to one I cast, being a 29 gr slug with HP. Mine is .29.3 grains sized to .2510" and is extremely accurate in my L/W barrel. However, being a 1-17" twist, it does start to become unstable a longer ranges. It is simply over spun. the FX barrel is however, 1-20" twist and does not suffer this shortcoming.



An excellent example of this is my .257 test. The .257 is shooting 80 to 110 gr. bullets like lasers. The 88 Gr. spire point will group 1/4" to under 1/2" at 100" all day long. I tried the 50 gr slugs, and it starts the death spiral at apx. 66-65 yards. this is a 1-14 TJ's Barrel. When I switch to a 1-17 barrel, it does not. Two different barrels twist rates, give widely different results with different length bullets. If needed, I will measure the oal of the bullets.



Another good example is the .177. I only have knowledge of the .172, but in this case, same same Like most typical AG barrels, they are old tried adn kinda true 1-16 to 1in 17 twist. this works fairly well in .177. Ever notice in airguns, all barrels are the near same twist regardless of cal.? This comes from the distant past, long before the high performance AG's we enjoy today. The AG industry has ignored what the PB world discovered a log-long time ago. Different twist for different projectiles. They are standardized. The AG world has resisted standardation. In this case for instance, for slugs, the .172 requires a 1 in 9" twist. Unheard of in AG barrels.

Yes, I am aware the .172 is not .177. But neither is the bore of a.177 really a .177. so it is a mute point. A .22 AG bore is no where near a .22 cal at all. Usually a .216 to .219. Another case of no standardization. It drives me nuts. But exactly why simply buying a slug titled as what you think your barrel is cant work unless you are extremely lucky. If you are that lucky often, it's time to play the lottery, or head to Vegas. LOL I keep a good supply of bullet sizers for this reason, in order to size exactly to my barrels. I don't depend on blind luck. ;<)



Disclaimer: My slugs are my personal use slugs for both target, hunting and continued testing. They are not sold to the public. I Cast for .172, .223, .25 and .257. 



KnifeMaker



Knife
 
No, FX barrels are not fussy at all. Nick of NSA, maker of mighty fine slugs for airguns understands this, and has worked with FX to develop his slugs to be very accurate in them. First the correct dia. for the bores, and secondly, the overall length to best take advantage of the twist rates.



Sorry Knife but that is rubbish! hence the huge amount of people that are not having "immediate" success with slugs and are asking for help.

I have 2 FX IMPACT & 2 FX Crown practically every liner that they make, including a couple made for me personally by Johan for testing with slugs.

I agree that manufacturers including NIELSEN are designing their slugs to shoot from specific set-up's HOWEVER even the legend that is Mr Dubber admits on video at PA comp that two seemingly identical liners may not both shoot the same slug.



 
I to want to add my 2c in this discussion FWIW? You do not need a choke for slugs if given proper twist rate for weight @ lengths of these projectiles “actually better if you don’t” now that I said this! for best accuracy at the subsonic speeds we are shooting and the non expanding HOT GASES (ever notice that your moderator has condensation on it? humid air condensing on the cool metal) the plume coming out the muzzle is condensation not typical with powder guns... you need very shallow lands maybe a “4 groove maybe a 12 groove?” but definitive land and groove rifling! What is happening is FX backed themselves into a corner because of their “patented” style of imparting twist into their barrels and trying to make it work for slugs! I hope Daystate isn’t wasting a lot of time trying to make LW poly-barrels work in this manner? I’m sure to stir a hornets nest with this! 
 
I to want to add my 2c in this discussion FWIW? You do not need a choke for slugs if given proper twist rate for weight @ lengths of these projectiles “actually better if you don’t” now that I said this! for best accuracy at the subsonic speeds we are shooting and the non expanding HOT GASES (ever notice that your moderator has condensation on it? humid air condensing on the cool metal) the plume coming out the muzzle is condensation not typical with powder guns... you need very shallow lands maybe a “4 groove maybe a 12 groove?” but definitive land and groove rifling! What is happening is FX backed themselves into a corner because of their “patented” style of imparting twist into their barrels and trying to make it work for slugs! I hope Daystate isn’t wasting a lot of time trying to make LW poly-barrels work in this manner? I’m sure to stir a hornets nest with this!

I have an unchoked poly that loves slugs and shoots pellets excellent too. I don't think anyone is backed into a corner.
 
Awesome!, I love FX barrel liners for pellets! Why is yours unchoked? Matt says the fx slug liners definitely need a choke per his video! Is yours a different brand then Fx or LW? Polygonal rifling profile is not exclusive to LW


Hey nomo I am glad we concurr that Mr Dubber is clear that FX IS using choked liners for slugs, no matter how minimal the choke, Daystate have not really wasted a lot of time on this, they got a number of us amateurs to do the testing for them, including Bob in Arizona!

Certainly there is something spectacular coming your way in the future as far as slug barrels go, BTW the process is "condensation", the effect you see via the thermal differential is "condensate!
 
Awesome!, I love FX barrel liners for pellets! Why is yours unchoked? Matt says the fx slug liners definitely need a choke per his video! Is yours a different brand then Fx or LW? Polygonal rifling profile is not exclusive to LW

Its a LW and i wanted a more slug specific barrel in .22. I had this before the release of the slug liners.

I bet it'll hang with the fx liners and so far definitely outshoots the .25 (slug) liner.
 
Gotcha, I’m not bashing Fx, I just believe there is a better barrel profile than Fx’s or LW poly if you want to shoot slugs only! Also why with the type of barrels they produce it require a choke to preform well? Slugs are quite a different animal than pellets! And the barrel industry has proven for yrs you can do this with a traditional land and groove barrel “no choke” and I believe most rimfire br barrels are traditional land and groove? This is the closest velocity and psi to a pcp? Especially since the slug shooters keep upping the velocity close to rimfire velocities?
 
By the way I’ve had really good luck with both Fx & LW barrels “poly and 12 groove!”actually I think the 12 groove was more accurate overall, probably just was one of those “magic” barrels? But if I have to spend my money right now For a do everything with one barrel gun,no question Daystate. The combination of electronic’s and their work w/ LW its a no brainer for me, now a gun manufacturer for the long haul!, slug specific or pellet specific (not a one barrel do everything gun) is AMERICAN AIR ARMS! IMO
 
By the way I’ve had really good luck with both Fx & LW barrels “poly and 12 groove!”actually I think the 12 groove was more accurate overall, probably just was one of those “magic” barrels? But if I have to spend my money right now For a do everything with one barrel gun,no question Daystate. The combination of electronic’s and their work w/ LW its a no brainer for me, now a gun manufacturer for the long haul!, slug specific or pellet specific (not a one barrel do everything gun) is AMERICAN AIR ARMS! IMO

The AAA is kind of ugly though IMO. Dont the Redwolf and Safari use poly barrels?
 
You know guys sometimes I’m to opinionated For my own good and start these topics or replies on the wrong foot so to speak! In the end it’s all about shooting, having fun with friends and family regardless of what brand you like! We all share the same passion for the sport and I am continuously learning From everyone on this forum!, but nothing replaces just getting out there and SHOOTING! With that being said I’m taking a break for awhile no forums just shooting...

Joe
 
No, FX barrels are not fussy at all. Nick of NSA, maker of mighty fine slugs for airguns understands this, and has worked with FX to develop his slugs to be very accurate in them. First the correct dia. for the bores, and secondly, the overall length to best take advantage of the twist rates.



Sorry Knife but that is rubbish! hence the huge amount of people that are not having "immediate" success with slugs and are asking for help.

I have 2 FX IMPACT & 2 FX Crown practically every liner that they make, including a couple made for me personally by Johan for testing with slugs.

I agree that manufacturers including NIELSEN are designing their slugs to shoot from specific set-up's HOWEVER even the legend that is Mr Dubber admits on video at PA comp that two seemingly identical liners may not both shoot the same slug.



Mark, if you don't want to "spray" pay attention. People are asking for help ad I am trying to help. Much to your disapproval.



I know Matt, Nick o NSA, Tom, owner of AAA, NOE's Swede Nelson of NOE Bullet molds, and D-Rig of varmint knockers , Doug Nobel, Tofazfou, RoachCreek, Bob Stern the internal and external ballistics theorist and many other bullet shooting notables as you call them legends. They all know me as well, and respect what I do. Well all agree. Matt is a "Legend" as you put it, because he makes vid's and really pays attention and is learning every day. He is as I said, and he freely admits, new to the slug game, has made great strides with FX. How did he become interested in slugs in the firs place? By paying attention to what many of us have been doing for years. He Pays ATTENTION! Listens and learns.+ Test-Test-Test!!!



I have been shooting slugs for many years and test from time to time for Nick and Swede. Matt is new to slugs, compared to the rest of us and his experience is limited to one brand of barrel on the subject.

We have tested TJ's, Bench Mark, L/W BSA, Remington, Marlin, Winchester, Douglas, Shillen, even a few Weatherby's and some custom barrels you probably have never thought of. Some of have fitted FX barrels to other platforms as well. What have we tried? You name it! My self, I shoot .22, .223, .224, .250, .257, and currently reading to build a .172 specializing in long range varminting with extreme accuracy. . .If it can't shoot under 1/4" at 100, I'm not impressed. Period

We must all all be full of BS and should have simply consulted you instead. How thoughtless, and a huge waste of time we have been involved in.

Just how many winning classes and awards do you have under your belt with your barrels, bullets, guns? how many custom slug shooters have you tested, or built, or even shot for that matter. Any background in external ballistics. Perhaps Barns, Hornady, Speer and many other companies would like to confer wit your knowledge. That is if you have any other expertise than watching vids or what you read on the net.



Show me your research. If any! Don't tell me I'm full of BS unless you can show your experience first hand. 

What I explained in my post is well known internal ballistic, understood for a lot of years in the industry. Ignoring it is exactly what got Airforce AG's in such how water upon the introduction of their like of big bores. 



Staying ignorant, or learning is up to you. No one can force you.





Knife








 
Sorry Knife but with the greatest of respect I don't really care who you are what you know or what you do, that has nothing to do with the point I made.

My point is very simple! the AVERAGE shooter will probably have to try numerous different slugs to find one that MAY suit their production barrel or FX SLUG liner, whichever it may be.

No AIRGUN MANFACTURER that I am aware of including FX has given a foolproof recipe, or even guidance really as to a specific slug that will definitely shoot well in their particular gun and set-up.

Why do you think JSB has not released a slug that works yet? even though they have a MKII IMPACT for testing? because they have made thousands and they don't work!- READ that more importantly they only work in a very narrow set of circumstances or particular liners.

Nick N of course has been at the forefront of design and working to offer enough variants so that most shooters can find something that works for their gun, I have sent him many an email and so has Laity, Nick can "reccommend" a slug that might work if you give him enough detail but often they dont, you may find another that he makes that works and thats great, NSA, VK, PROHUNTER etc. etc. all great quality products.

For the first time I had a DAYSTATE production barrel that shot the first slug I bought (NSA 18g) absolutely brilliantly out of the box, that is despite doing numerous amounts of testing with .22 cal H&N, NSA, VK, AGN, PROHUNTER etc. most of which we were given to test and did not pay for, very few shot well in our various set-ups, a few did some of the time and a couple of them all of the time and at every distance.

Does it make any more sense what I am saying?




 
Sorry Knife but with the greatest of respect I don't really care who you are what you know or what you do, that has nothing to do with the point I made.

My point is very simple! the AVERAGE shooter will probably have to try numerous different slugs to find one that MAY suit their production barrel or FX SLUG liner, whichever it may be.

No AIRGUN MANFACTURER that I am aware of including FX has given a foolproof recipe, or even guidance really as to a specific slug that will definitely shoot well in their particular gun and set-up.

Why do you think JSB has not released a slug that works yet? even though they have a MKII IMPACT for testing? because they have made thousands and they don't work!- READ that more importantly they only work in a very narrow set of circumstances or particular liners.

Nick N of course has been at the forefront of design and working to offer enough variants so that most shooters can find something that works for their gun, I have sent him many an email and so has Laity, Nick can "reccommend" a slug that might work if you give him enough detail but often they dont, you may find another that he makes that works and thats great, NSA, VK, PROHUNTER etc. etc. all great quality products.

For the first time I had a DAYSTATE production barrel that shot the first slug I bought (NSA 18g) absolutely brilliantly out of the box, that is despite doing numerous amounts of testing with .22 cal H&N, NSA, VK, AGN, PROHUNTER etc. most of which we were given to test and did not pay for, very few shot well in our various set-ups, a few did some of the time and a couple of them all of the time and at every distance.

Does it make any more sense what I am saying?



Your first sentence shows you have no respect for any one except yourself, except for a bit of hero worship of Matt. Matt is very fortunate to be wealthy enough to be alble to fly around the word testing and visiting with different Manufacturers. However, he is basically putting all the eggs in one basket. There are many platforms being used for bullet shooting. The Drummen Sinners have figured it out long ago for instance. Winning most European Bench Rest matches for years now.



I just re-watched Matt's vid, The Ultimate Guide to Slug Liner. Just to see If I made an error. Well, I didn't! If you watch again, at 18+ minutes, you will find that Matt, who you have on a pedestal, says exactly the opposite of what you state he says. Apparently there is an issue with reading comprehension on your part. Or you simply skipped part of the vid Mat presented.



He does say that attention to hammer force, and valving makes a huge difference. Particularly where the air form the shot is still exiting the muzzle as the slug exits it. And he is exactly right. It makes a HUGE difference!





Pleas watch again before taking it upon your self to bully people with experience, for simply trying to help newer slug shooters. Very unimpressive, and inexcusable. Cussing me doesn't impress me or anyone else!



Knife





 
I have used a few FX slug liners and to be honest I was more than surprised that the slugs we tried did not work at all. I was under the impression , I am sure most people are , that if you buy a liner .. you can shoot slugs ... This is not correct . I know there is a bunch of setting up to do but I am sorry , they did not work . I tried about 6 different makes and weights and nothing worked. I have also tried a bunch through my Red Wolf HP and some worked , most did not . I think they work ... if you are lucky .



Rog


 
Ok Knife sorry if you think I am "cussing" you, I am not, perhaps my original use of the word "rubbish" should have read "not true in my opinion"

Lets leave those things to lie, this is not personal and if it appears to be then I apologise.

Okay so firstly I am not elevating Mr Dubber, the use of the word legend was in fact tongue in cheek.

The slug liner video did indeed mention the importance of "tuning" however it is superceeded IMO again by Matts admission in the AEAC PA cup video that two identical liners (or barrels) may not shoot the exact same slug to the same level, perhaps then the slug itself should be labelled "fussy" then and not the liner/barrel.

My opinion on this again is simple, a lot of airgunners will put a slug liner into their gun and expect instant results, this is simply not the case and could be classed as a little more than misleading.

Lastly I have no idea what you mean by bullying? and I am not trying to impress new slug shooters (of which I am one as to a lesser extent is Laity above) this thread was about removing the choke from a barrel, we tried it and in our experiment it did not work, I reported that and everyone else seemed happy with the honest input, even though some said it did work for them, good on them, if I have altered the course of this thread to its detriment then I apologise again.