• Please consider adding your "Event" to the Calendar located on our Home page!

Red Wolf HP .22

I would like to draw on members experience with the Daystate Red Wolf HP in .22 with the GCU2 board. How accurate should I expect this gun to be at 100yds.? Is the gun capable of sub 1” groups at this distance with the factory tune or does it need to be tweaked to achieve them? I notice that the FX brand of .22 25.39 grain pellets have a deeper well behind the head than the JSBs in the same weight. Which is best for extended ranges? I value everyone’s opinion. Thanks
 
Frankly sub one inch at 100 going to be hard to achieve with any air rifle CONSISTENTLY. Having been a member of the forum for several years and having read a lot of what is posted there are plenty of threads reporting groups which are very small. However there are also reminders of competition results which would seem to indicate that even the most competitive shooters rarely shoot that consistently.
I can’t tell you what might be the best approach to take with your specific rifle but before you invest in the rifle it might be best to invest time and effort to see what you as a shooter might be able to do. 
I would suggest not starting at 100 but perhaps at 50 yards. You will need to learn to judge conditions and to test ammo. You need an extremely stable platform to shoot from. A good scope and shooting technique and a lot of practice and persistence. Any change in conditions and especially wind speed and direction will significantly change your point of impact even at 50 yards

This will be challenging and at times frustrating. There are just so many variables. What works well on one day may not on another . Follow thru and trigger control with a air rifle are critical.
Keep your expectations of yourself and the rifle realistic. If you begin to start to see improvement and progress then like many of us do spend to hopefully do even better. Or jump in and send the rifle to be tuned and then hope .you can get the results you are looking for.
Have you noticed test targets for air rifles and rim fires as well are never at 100 yards.
One additional comment . Hunting rifle configured rifle stocks are difficult to shoot off of bags. If you study this the guys that are shooting tiny groups no matter what discipline are using wide fore arms and rather specialized gear. 
 
Yes, they are capable of sub-MOA at 100 yards with the factory tune. But for me it still requires some luck and favorable environmental conditions. And lots of experience shooting the gun, and finding the optimal projectile.

My new favorite longer distance round for my GC2 .22 RW is the Howler slug. So far that has given me excellent accuracy - better even than any pellet I have tried.

Unfortunately I'm only at the beginning of shooting/testing with the Howlers. I found the groups shrank in size @ 50 &100 yards when I shot them on MID power as opposed to HIGH power. But I actually haven't even gotten around to chrono testing them yet (D'oh!). It is a work in progress, as 100 yard shooting will likely always be for me. 
 
Easy ridemm

All, Nomojo65, John and Tom gave you solid advise. I just wanted to add a little bit more to think about.

The topic of unrealistic expectations has been discussed here, over and over again. New air gunners buy a top tier air gun but can’t seem to achieve the groups they’ve seen online. Shooter abilities obviously need to be taken into consideration and often are not. Many just assume that because they bought a great air gun, they should be capable too. I’m not saying you, just people who have run into this problem in the past.

In addition, so many new shooters see pictures of other’s “great groups” and assume it’s normal. Often, those who post photos will exaggerate the distances, cherry pick the groups or just flat out lie about them. We’ve all posted pictures of great groups, all of us! It’s human nature to want to share. I’m not calling anybody out, I’ve don’t it too! You just need to take all of these “exceptional groups” with a grain of salt and obviously give more credence to videos than photos. The more and more you shoot, you’ll quickly learn what is really achievable and what isn’t. With that said, I’ve seen pictures of groups and thought to myself, No Fu——g way, only to see a video of the shooter later and realize that it was 100% legit. That’s pretty rare though. 

A great way to understand what is real and what isn’t, is by looking at RMAC and EBR targets. Even the very best, world class shooters don’t shoot sub moa groups all that often in real world conditions. It’s also very important to distinguish the difference between precision and accuracy, especially when shooting in wind…

Accuracy = hitting what you’re aiming at, the bullseye.

Precision = pellet after pellet in the same hole. 

Under optimal conditions; no wind, an excellent shooter, sorted and weighed pellets and a properly set up Red Wolf, it is certainly capable of sub moa groups. However, In the real world; wind, unsorted pellets, gun shooting good to great, even with an excellent shooter, the probability of sob moa groups has decreased substantially, it is much, much harder. Since these are the conditions that most of us face daily, start testing close to put the odds in your favor, like 30 yards. To shoot sub moa groups at 100yds, your groups at 30yds should be less than a 1/3 of an inch. If that’s happening, move back to 50yds and look for 1/2 inch groups, then to 75yds and look for 3/4” groups. Finally, move to 100yds and strive for groups under 1 inch.

When shooting at 100yds, your gun’s set up, pellet choice, the gun’s stability on the bench, a consistent hold, cheek placement, natural point of aim, breathing, trigger press, follow through, and your wind calls are all vastly important. Your Red Wolf with the GCU2 is certainly very capable, one of the best available! 

Have a good one!

Stoti
 
Good post by @stoti The simple answer to your question is yes…. and no. If you’re a very good shooter in very mild conditions, then yes. All other times, no. You may luck into a sub MOA group from time to time, but generally in real world conditions you’ll do well to keep your ten shot groups inside 2 inches, which happens to be the 8 ring on an EBR Target. Sometimes when you’re in the zone you can keep all your shots inside the 9 ring, which is 1.2 inches. That is tournament WINNING performance. The recent winner of EBR didn’t even average a 9 for all 25 shots, so his average superimposed group size was slightly over 1.5 inches. And that’s an incredible shooter at the biggest Airgun tournament in the world shooting at the same time against 39 other shooters…. I’m not trying to dissuade you from the Red Wolf, it’s an awesome gun, probably the best on the market. But keep your expectations in check when you get yours…. 
 
I had the bright idea to shoot at a 100 yard indoor range. Found one but the darned exhaust fan caused more trouble then a ten mph wind outside
2736ED00-DF93-47D9-878B-87103075D154.1635037882.jpeg
would have. Set up for powder burners. I’d like to see how my rifles and I would do. I have no skill doping the wind. I do have a nice 100 yard range in the back yard and on occasion it’s dead calm. I’ve shot an occasional sub inch group. Most of my guns are not set up for bench rest. I shoot a fair amount with powder burners and I’m convinced a gun is a lot more then a barrel and an action. If you want to really shoot small groups a BR rifle ( read Thomas) is going to get you the results . Next best the RAW BR guns. I’ve got a RAW 500 in 177. Asking it to shoot 100 yards? Never tried it. I might . What do you think ? My point is you need a lot more then you might think.
 
A lot of good advice/info has been given but not sure your question was answered. Imho the answer is yes.

They can almost certainly be improved but the improvement will likely be seen only in very critical conditions... ie bench shooting for score.

Rb-AOA has taken literally out of the box RW's and competed well and even won some events. No tuning or special treatment. Just clean the bore and go. He is a GREAT shot but it does reflect the capabilities.

Bob