i use a atn thor HD 5-50 thermal and I also have a digital NV .I prefer thermal as nothing can hide ,
nv
https://www.dropbox.com/s/7hdiis32acut23c/r5nitevision.jpg?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/home/my%20stuff/my%20gun%20stuff%20i/hunting%20pulsar?preview=013139.AVI thermal
https://www.dropbox.com/s/y189d2bhixahb8n/titusrunningzoomingblkhot.MOV?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/l7f1vc8ixv6mby1/doedeerredhot.MOV?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/hvwc3mp5thmavaj/squirrel60ydkill.MOV?dl=0 I feel up to 100 yds my nv is fine but I can see squirrels up to 300 yd and I can see deer to 1500 yd easily , But however , I feel My thermal would be fine say out to 300 yd on a coyote , which I can detect them at 600 to 100 yd , it is the lack of my ability to hit a small target beyond 300 yd with it ,
What I am saying is it is not a FFP scopes with mil turrets , While it has a ballistics program to adjust for wind and elevation and all inputs I my self never used this function , I like making my own calls , I think if you spend alot of time with it yes you can get your holds down pat , I simply dont use mine enough like I do my scopes , I do plan on selling both of mine and buying a very good clip on and use my optics with it ,
But yes it opend up a new way of hunting , when I scan trees for squirrels then scan with thermal I seel like up too 6 or 8 I never would have seen with just my eyes or even binoculars ,
Also when I hunt I always carry my Leopold tracker 2 HD thermal , to find my squirrels , boy this thing is a time saver , they stand right out where they blend in with say leaves and ground ,
SO my atn sees great from say 35 yards to 2000 plus and my hand held is good from 1 foot to say 35 yards with definition
LOU