G
Guest
Guest
There was a topic started here awhile back. What do you see new for airguns in 2021. Or something like that? I brought up this very thing. I knew it was coming. Some have said it's hard to discuss this without getting political. So what? It IS POLITICAL.
These things need to be discussed within the shooting community. Burying our head in the sand because you're afraid to get political, is a great way to lose all your freedoms. And trust me. They do want to take most, if not all our freedoms away. To do that, you start with the 1st and 2nd Amendment.
While I agree largely with you, I think the intent with the AGN rule is clear: aside from airgun laws or laws immediately pertaining to airguns, all other political discussion is prohibited. If you saw Off Topic in the last 5 months, and its disappearance, you can see some of the logic behind the AGN rule. So back to this discussion and its impact on airguns! Usually laws like this get pushed to push the overton window further away from gun friendly policy. The next round of policies then usually shuttle in smaller portions of this same law. Doubt me? Look at the 2016 Ammo Apocalypse laws in California, which did directly impact airgunning believe it or not. How? Most stores that are brick and mortar that carried ammo also sold pellets, and because of the law it made it financially not sustainable for most retailers to train their employees on background checks and so on, so they opted out of the whole sporting ammo department, and along with that pellets for airguns. Walmart in my area is a major one I can think of that has done this. Lots of times regulations hit your wallets first before outright banning something (which they don't have to do if they just take away the option in the mean time). Additionally, why would gun stores cut further into their profit by offering a more affordable alternative in airguns? Lead in California will be the next battle, so it is nice to see some companies proactively working on non-lead options.
Upvote 0