new guy here,optics question

Hello everybody i want to get into the pcp and looking around for some good deals that dont break the bank,anyway here is a scope i came across

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

and was wondering would that be a good fir for pcp,looking to shoot 75yds tops,but 50 will be probably very common
i dont know the first thing about optics,always been a bow hunter :) so i figured better ask you guys than getting generic chat gpt answers
I appreciate it
 
Hello everybody i want to get into the pcp and looking around for some good deals that dont break the bank,anyway here is a scope i came across

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

and was wondering would that be a good fir for pcp,looking to shoot 75yds tops,but 50 will be probably very common
i dont know the first thing about optics,always been a bow hunter :) so i figured better ask you guys than getting generic chat gpt answers
I appreciate it
No. The reticle is specific to a 6.5 creedmore trajectory.

Try not to get scopes with caliber specific or "BDC" reticle. Because they're designed for centerfire or some rimfire calibers specifically.
 
IF U HAD SCOPE YOU CAN USE IT BUT , ID OPT FOR A MIL OR MOA SCOPE , HERE IS RETICLE ON THAT SCOPE

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

1755454096048.jpg



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
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hateful McNasty
Hello everybody i want to get into the pcp and looking around for some good deals that dont break the bank,anyway here is a scope i came across

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

and was wondering would that be a good fir for pcp,looking to shoot 75yds tops,but 50 will be probably very common
i dont know the first thing about optics,always been a bow hunter :) so i figured better ask you guys than getting generic chat gpt answers
I appreciate it
@dabaka What’s your budget for a scope? Do you have a preferred magnification range? Do you know if you prefer first focal plane or second focal plane scopes? Do you know if you would like an illuminated reticle to aid in shooting in low light conditions?

If cannot answer these questions, consider watching the linked video below to become acquainted with some rifle scope basics. It is less than 10 minutes in length.



Scope Anatomy and Terminology

7 Things You Need to Know About Air Rifle Scopes

 
Last edited:

jwrabbit123

WHY YA GOTTA YELL?!?!? (Just kidding)

Burris actually has decent glass and the pricing is competitive as well.

The scope that you have indicated actually also come in MOA, sans the "Creedmore 6.5" reticle. But you should confirm that for certain.
It's also slightly more cash at $468.
Looks like you're into the side focus, which is a desirable item.

Another issue to consider is that it has a 1" tube, most now are 30mm, giving a slight edge in turret click, being more than a 1" tube can give. Something to consider. You'll need to know the height required to clear any items such as magazines on your rifle, that will determine which rings to buy as well.

From what I see, that is a decent scope as long as you can confirm that it comes in standard MOA and NOT the Creedmore 6.5 reticle only.

mike
 
Whats the don't bust the bank price range ? Anything over tasco from Walmart busts mine 🥴

check these and do there email alert for sales .. last one had 40% off certain ones

Anyways ( air gun page )

 
Last edited:

jwrabbit123

WHY YA GOTTA YELL?!?!? (Just kidding)

Burris actually has decent glass and the pricing is competitive as well.

The scope that you have indicated actually also come in MOA, sans the "Creedmore 6.5" reticle. But you should confirm that for certain.
It's also slightly more cash at $468.
Looks like you're into the side focus, which is a desirable item.

Another issue to consider is that it has a 1" tube, most now are 30mm, giving a slight edge in turret click, being more than a 1" tube can give. Something to consider. You'll need to know the height required to clear any items such as magazines on your rifle, that will determine which rings to buy as well.

From what I see, that is a decent scope as long as you can confirm that it comes in standard MOA and NOT the Creedmore 6.5 reticle only.

mike
Also like to add that I believe Burris made that scope sfp, so at any magnification other than the "1:1" designated magnification those increments will change in scale. Which can really cause confusion someone who might not know.
 
IF U HAD SCOPE YOU CAN USE IT BUT , ID OPT FOR A MIL OR MOA SCOPE , HERE IS RETICLE ON THAT SCOPE

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

View attachment 586769


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

Ya i need hold over and hold under

Seem scope companies don't want to offer much in mildot as they want to offer tactakool lately .. lol
 
2 great budget options for that
Athlon talos mildot
And the Hawke vantage 4-12x40ao
I use athlon talos with mildot on my stuff . Im wishing athlon would add mildot to there more affordable neos line . They probably get more airgun business if they did . Especially the side focus neos for sure .
 
  • Like
Reactions: RoosterCogburn
I avoid anything with BDC. Even if you had a 6.5 Creedmoor, are you shooting the same length barrel as it's set up for, the same grain bullet. If you use a longer barrel and heavier bullet than, say, what that scope is designed for, then the BDC is useless. But let's say you already have the scope, then use it and just figure out what all those mean for you and your set up. But just know if you change pellet weight, or let's say to slugs, you'll need to relearn what all those hash marks mean. I tend to like something like a mil dot reticle, keeps it simpler.
Also, and this is huge, make sure to get a scope with parallax as low as you plan to shoot. Very unlikely a 6.5 Creedmoor scope will have any parallax down to 10-15 yeards.
 
Last edited:
I recommend considering Hawke AirMax 4-12x50 AO as a comparison. I have several on my PCPs and their ladder and dot reticles provide more than enough increments for 25 to 160 meters.

Since I don't know your preferences or type of shooting, I can only suggest that this may be an option.

Hawke Airmax Reticle.jpg


I've had (and still have) a number of other scopes, including AirMax30 6-24x50SF with the AMX reticle. The 6-24 lacks sufficient elevation range when at 24x so I only use that for spotting. Likely, someone with a younger brain could make use of the 24x at shorter ranges but I find that I am better with the same scope on all my guns. I switch guns frequently when at the range and using a different scope makes for issues in coping,

*Edit: The cross bars on the lower reticle help a lot in judging windage when shooting beyond 115 meters in the wind.
 
This is another rabbit hole all in itself. I would recommend watching the videos posted to learn some basics about scopes. I will say you certainly don’t need to break the bank for 75 yards and in. You just need to decide if you want to try first focal plane or second. Mil or moa. It’s also good to find a model that parallaxes close range. Those factors will help narrow choices a bit. You will find a bunch as today there are numerous brands manufactured in the same places in China that are basically the same scope with slight tweaks. Makes it hard to determine where to spend your money. The good news is you can get a pretty damn good scope for under 250 bucks today.
 
Hello everybody i want to get into the pcp and looking around for some good deals that dont break the bank,anyway here is a scope i came across

Burris 4-16x50mm Fullfield IV 6.5 Creedmoor Scope​

and was wondering would that be a good fir for pcp,looking to shoot 75yds tops,but 50 will be probably very common
i dont know the first thing about optics,always been a bow hunter :) so i figured better ask you guys than getting generic chat gpt answers
I appreciate it
First , Welcome to the best A G N . i would suggest any of the Athlon line , and start with a middle of the pact scope in SFP (second focal plane ) the retical stays the same size and so makes it easier to learn . Plus you said 30 to 50 or so yards so you do not need a FFP scope
Again Welcome !
Stan in Ky .
 
If you really want to see many scope comparisons, take a look at Jungleshooter's spreadsheet. It's an EXCELLENT resource and well assembled to aid in what your intent and use may be.
it's within this thread....

mike
 
I recommend considering Hawke AirMax 4-12x50 AO as a comparison. I have several on my PCPs and their ladder and dot reticles provide more than enough increments for 25 to 160 meters.

Since I don't know your preferences or type of shooting, I can only suggest that this may be an option.

View attachment 586917

I've had (and still have) a number of other scopes, including AirMax30 6-24x50SF with the AMX reticle. The 6-24 lacks sufficient elevation range when at 24x so I only use that for spotting. Likely, someone with a younger brain could make use of the 24x at shorter ranges but I find that I am better with the same scope on all my guns. I switch guns frequently when at the range and using a different scope makes for issues in coping,

*Edit: The cross bars on the lower reticle help a lot in judging windage when shooting beyond 115 meters in the wind.

I second the Hawke scope recommendation. They are great scopes, have a lifetime warranty and work very well on air guns.

I really like the 2-7x32 Hawke Airmax front AO. Small, lightweight, bright, great reticle and pairs perfectly with the BKL droop mount. I usually shoot at 4x or 6x out to 100 yards.


 
I guess I got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, but I think I can see the future of this thread. It goes on and on -- trying to HELP the orignal poster. I doubt that the original poster will ever give anyone here any feedback at all -- not answer a single question -- no response at all. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sure tired of being right. We'll see. It makes me think all new guys are frickin' robot data collectors.

stovepipe
 
I guess I got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning, but I think I can see the future of this thread. It goes on and on -- trying to HELP the orignal poster. I doubt that the original poster will ever give anyone here any feedback at all -- not answer a single question -- no response at all. I hope I'm wrong, but I'm sure tired of being right. We'll see. It makes me think all new guys are frickin' robot data collectors.

stovepipe
Perhaps some new members are intimidated at asking question in case there are negative responses? ;)
 
Perhaps some new members are intimidated at asking question in case there are negative responses? ;)
Well, the OP has already seen his first negative response -- mine. I feel a lot better now that I went out back and shot the living hell out of my targets. Sometimes that's all it takes to fix a wrong-side-of-the-bed day. I'm not usually so grumpy.

stovepipe
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Normkel