New gun, new perspectives: RWS 54 Air King .22 cal

Hi Steve, thanks for sending the link! I wish I'd have seen it before. 😉 It just goes to show there's many ways to peel an onion, as I've taken a different approach. I understand that each rifle will have its own idiosyncrasies and machining tolerance variations, but here's what I've done to mine with the goal of a consistent, precise and smooth release of the ball bearing from the detent upon firing

29B2A9C8-1898-4751-ABA2-AC04095F7408.1607868122.jpeg


The above shows "sled refinement #3" using steel to space behind the o-rings. For the previous sled refinement #2 , I used PFTE washers:

075A82AD-A5D6-4B11-85FA-576754D3958A.1607869002.jpeg


Also, I've eliminated the fwd-aft movement of the steel rails via shims between the circlips and outside of slide bracket. It took several different shim thicknesses to get it right but now there is no noticeable movement of the rails fwd/aft - which in my mind means the recoil managing sled system will work even better. 

I also polished both spring ends (detent force adjustment) finished with 2000 grit and oil, but went a step beyond😉: The pic below will give you an idea of what was done. The final result is much different, especially when everything was measured and cut. 

9F27B891-ADBC-47A6-9090-774173437DF4.1607869298.jpeg


I learned a lot in this process, and I'm confident that this detent adjustment spring and rear slide now can perform with greater consistency and uniformity in terms of how both act on the ball bearing😉. Adjustment of the detent force is free and unobstructed.

A975AB0E-3F03-4441-8100-99A6FA76DAE2.1607869300.jpeg


Onwards & upwards- more shooting to do and more refinements to be made🤓😉
 
Good choice. I just missed getting one off the Umarex website. I bought the RWS 3500 and it couldn't hit the broad side of a barn. I sent it back and they told me it was discontinued. So it ended up with a Umarex Gauntlet .177 so I could have something to tinker with the winter. I still want to get a 54 or a 48 but I'll wait till a used one comes up.
 
A little bit of this, little bit of that...😉

Naughty area impeding my sled action:

8CA242B1-53A8-4484-A0AA-56B82B9F60F6.1609713900.jpeg
9536086A-102B-4336-BE42-65C475FD2D0B.1609713901.jpeg


Shaving off a bit of this pesky material as well:

318A2270-422D-42BA-93C2-1B58C3EE37A9.1609713903.jpeg



That's more like it:

5596366E-9C41-4208-A38C-972FE5B6C03D.1609713904.jpeg




5A474103-5F9E-4938-B578-97E98868758A.1609713908.jpeg


Tried a Nikon 3-9 EFR Target (nice scope);

38D14200-F491-46B0-8CB8-11B686C9898B.1609713910.jpeg


The bushings I used in the beginning have done their job and held up fine for 500 shots, but these will work even better:

5A053B12-9E48-43F8-A574-E6FF7740B426.1609713912.jpeg




A1BEFE6B-4968-49C7-A1A6-A58DEBAB6017.1609714643.jpeg


Might as well immerse myself in the newness of it all, and try something I haven't done in years since my training with the 1st Marine Division out of Camp Pendleton- using a bipod in the prone position:

6FFD376E-CDC8-479C-A206-E01761769B2F.1609713916.jpeg


Fun times on this beautiful Sunday. Very windy, I was watching pellets get pushed 4" at 55 yards.

36C1F77B-96B0-41A1-B3F9-38F579039E1C.1609713917.jpeg



 
Sure thing Larry. 2nd Generation, LOL, love it! 🤓

What's in the bottom of the hole is the same as before: thin plastic disc laid down first followed by punched steel discs. What's changed is the bushing material: PFTE instead of rubber. The recoil pins once lined up with the mount in place (and snugged up towards the rear) don't have much wiggle room. I should never have the problem of having marred up and elongated recoil pin holes on the rail. That's the plan at least😉.

I had an opportunity to inspect things when I mounted the Nikon 3-9. I was curious to get a feel for sled adjustments with a lighter weight scope but for long distance shooting and wind doping the Sightron 6-24 is better so that went back on.