• The AGN App is ready! To compliment this new tech we've assigned the "Threads" Feed & "Dark" Mode. To revert back click HERE.

New Accu-Tac Bipods - Re-designed!!

Accu-Tac has redesigned all of their bipods and will no longer be offering the old style. They've also slimmed down their selection to only their best selling models. 

A lot of bench rest shooters use their old FC-5 or FC-10 models due to their wide stance. But, they only had the option to pan. If you wanted cant/tilt, you were forced to choose from models with a narrower stance. The newly designed FC-G2 offers BOTH pan and cant! Also, they've changed the legs. The older models had longer legs. The new model has the short legs but, they have the ability to extend. 

1544276831_5069577695c0bcb5f38b280.39682006_Screen Shot 2018-12-08 at 6.46.45 AM.png


Their base model, the BR-4, now sports the new legs and the re-designed center hub. Basically, the only thing that remains unchanged is the way the legs attach to the center hub and the way they lock in. When comparing the new to the old, it looks like they reversed the center design. But, they've done more than that. The way the cant system locks has been redesigned to a more reliable, easier to use system. 

The winged thumbscrew of the old system could be a bit hard to get to for shooters with larger hands and it left the possibility of catching a knuckle on one of the inside screws or leg lock points. The new system incorporates an easily accessible lever style lock that's easy to access and easy to use. Also, the lever is spring loaded. So, if you don't like where it's sitting once locked, give it a "pull and twist" and it will click into another spot. 

The quick release thumb nut has been replaced with a hex head screw that sits inside a recess. In order to adjust rail tension, you move the lever to the unlock position, push it, and spin the hex head. 

1544282344_8801704465c0be0e86defc7.60651097_IMG_6390.JPG
1544282345_19717889805c0be0e92be7f9.90139755_IMG_6391.JPG


The new legs are wider, thicker, and have the ability to extend vs the old thin style with no adjustment. The feet are much larger too and re-inforced with support cups. 

1544282272_18785747685c0be0a006fad8.29316879_IMG_6387.JPG


When comparing the FC-G2 vs the old FC-10, right away I notice the difference in leg height and thickness. I also notice how the picatinny attachment sits higher when compared to the hinge point of the legs. There's pro's and con's to this. When I think about stability, I want low and wide. So, having that attachment lower in the bipod would seem like a better setup. However, sitting here writing this at my desk, the height difference is less than an inch. The lower legs also bring the center of gravity down. Overall, I thinking his system is going to work out better than the old tall models. 

Another subtle difference I noticed is that the quick release lever no longer conflicts with the hub frame. The old model, you'd have to pan to the side in order to release the lever all the way which was annoying but, the new one clears the hub without any interference. This is a big deal if you're a "Set it and forget it" type of shooter.

All of the other changes I mentioned above about the BR-4 also apply to the new FC-G2.

1544284367_9094950145c0be8cf1fd765.05034191_IMG_6537.jpg
1544284544_4243552995c0be980451817.59269643_IMG_6542.JPG
1544286652_3269032405c0bf1bc1d0be7.07827075_IMG_6539.JPG




Interesting note: The legs on all the Accu-tac models are easily interchangeable (except the HD-50). A long while ago, I swapped the legs around on my older models and came up with a super low and wide model that I named the "TC-5" (TomCat-5) I used the old BR-4 legs with the wide F series base. It worked out well but, was right on the border of being too low. The new FC-G2 legs are just a little bit taller and the hub sits about an inch higher which means that this should work out to be just right! I asked about what all the letters and numbers mean. It seems that's a bit of mystery even to some of the people working at Accu-Tac. So, I'm going to say that the FC stands for FAT CAT! 😄 

As I stated earlier, the Accu-Tac lineup has been slimed down to 5 models. 

The HD-50 $383 (This one is designed specifically for .50 cal pb rifles)

The FC-G2 $434

The LR10-G2 $343 (Longer & fatter legs than the FC-G2 and cant only, no pan)

The SR5-G2 $317 (Longer legs than the FC-G2 and cant only, no pan)

The BR-4 $308 (Same legs as the FC-G2 and cant only, no pan)

So, let's say you want the taller legs on the wide body. For now, the only way to do that is to pick up the FC-G2 and either an LR-10 or an SR-5. That's pricey! For arguments sake, let's say you picked up an LR-10. You'd actually end up with the ability to have an FC-G2, LR-10, BR-4, and an unavailable model - a tall FC10-G2, due to the Accu-Tac's ability to easily swap legs. By the way, the legs are interchangeable between the old style bipods and the new style bipods.

The LR-10 and SR-5 have also been upgraded but, not to the degree that the FC-G2 and BR4 have. The new hub is the same as the BR-4. However, the legs have longer leg extensions with more notches that are closer together. 

There's some other features to these bipods that I like and will cover in an upcoming video. 

I hope you all enjoyed this pre-Shot Show sneak peek. 

Happy Shooting! 

Tomcat 

😺

1544286580_18919901375c0bf174d013d6.82384555_IMG_6538.jpg





 
Great, yes I find the lever/pan/attach position on the FC a pain Tom, but the rest of it is so good you just accept it! so the FC-G2 is availible next year some time? just binned the ATLAS I like the Accutac so much! (bought on the strength of your video one of the best purchases I have made-along with the Omega).

Can't wait to get my hands on one!


 
@Spray1Mark - I do not have an official release date but, I would not be surprised if it's right after Shot Show (Jan 21-25). I'm really glad to hear that I was able to give you some useful info through my videos! I'm headed out to film a "first impressions" video on these new models right now. ;)

Update: During filming of the video, I went through installing the FC-G2 again and again. There is no interference with the QR lever as long as you do not have any tilt towards the lever side. If you leave it tilted to the to the lever side, the lever will run into the hub. If you shoot from a bench that always tilts to the lever side, you can avoid this issue by simply turning the bipod around. 

Tom
 
@Peskadot671 - The BR4 is a great bipod and I agree that the pan feature has limited use for benchrest style shooting and, it would seem, airguns in general. If I need to pan, I just unweight the front of the rifle and turn it, right? lol

@Douger - When it comes to performance, they are neck and neck with Atlas. I'm planning a head to head bipod test for the future which will include Atlas, Accu-Tac, Harris, Evolution, and anyone else from Shot Show that wants to be included.;) I actually already filmed this test many months ago but, it had too many discrepancies for me. 

@Funshine - Thanks 

@Spray1Mark - I'm going to show your comment to the CEO of Accu-Tac in a few days. Same goes for you @SpeedStar



TO ALL - Thank you! I have much more to come. It's a little hard to find time to film these days since I'm still moving into my new residence and still working on the Tomcat Airguns studio. On top of that, it's Winter in Colorado. I'm sure you can all imagine how the cold and snow puts a halt on plans. Luckily, hard work generates heat. So, while I may not be filming, I am still getting a lot of work done. 

Cheers!

Tom
 
@mtnGhost - The main difference is centered all around the cant/tilt tensioning. The way it works is different as well as there's now a lever instead of a thumbscrew. I'm going to say, yes. I think it's worth it to go for the Gen2 if you can. I would have been on the fence if it were a BR-4. But, the longer legs of the LR-10 are able to put more force on the center hub making it more susceptible to inadvertent canting. The new design allows you to apply more force on the tensioning screw and really "lock it down" more effectively than the old design.

...It might be a bit much for your Leshiy though?! LOL!

Thanks for the compliment! It's nice to know that the videos I'm making are educating others and helping them to make the right decisions for their shooting style.

Happy Shooting,

Tom
 
@mtnGhost - The main difference is centered all around the cant/tilt tensioning. The way it works is different as well as there's now a lever instead of a thumbscrew. I'm going to say, yes. I think it's worth it to go for the Gen2 if you can. I would have been on the fence if it were a BR-4. But, the longer legs of the LR-10 are able to put more force on the center hub making it more susceptible to inadvertent canting. The new design allows you to apply more force on the tensioning screw and really "lock it down" more effectively than the old design.

...It might be a bit much for your Leshiy though?! LOL!

Thanks for the compliment! It's nice to know that the videos I'm making are educating others and helping them to make the right decisions for their shooting style.

Happy Shooting,

Tom

Ahh I see, thanks for clarifying. Also, LOL! Definitely not for the Leshiy :) .. I went with this LR-10 size for both a Sako and Impact X - for the latter, my Atlas BT10 wasn't cutting it and I wanted something longer with adjustability than my old Harris 😎

I actually received it while typing this reply, man this thing is STOUT!!! I think I'm just going to keep it - if the accidental canting gets me frustrated, I'll probably upgrade to the G2 (I'm probably going to get an SR-5 at some point as well though),

For anyone that wants to see the size comparison, here it is next to my little Atlas..

1550615253_6744302465c6c82d52cd0f7.75206218_CE50081F-3342-4412-B7C4-46B998131706.jpeg

 
I wound up also picking up the SR-5 G2. It's nearly as stout as the (gen1) LR-10, but they seem to be in slightly different classes from one another.

Although they're both new to me, I already prefer the older G1 adjustment / locking knob over the G2 lever. I would also probably choose the LR-10 for bench shooting, it's a big stable mofo.

Side by side for anyone interested..
1551389637_16112933385c7853c52a8b44.73925622_C3A1102F-5492-4649-9165-9E091FE1579C.jpeg
1551389638_8577046965c7853c64bec25.29887461_C61EAB9E-C32E-4D42-94CE-D52C7F4145D8.jpeg
1551389639_14108190785c7853c7957b23.91860294_25501865-F93A-4753-89F3-592A497F90DC.jpeg
1551389641_19913813035c7853c902ffe0.98328617_04379DA5-D5B6-415B-B713-8474F1FECF0F.jpeg





 
Thanks for sharing! From what I understand the "LR" stands for Large Rifle and the "SR" stands for Small Rifle. That's why... "I would also probably choose the LR-10 for bench shooting, it's a big stable mofo." lol That's also why you see the difference in the leg width and feel the additional weight. 

Different strokes for different folks! It's no surprise that some shooters will prefer the old models. They are a little more streamlined than the new ones. The good news is that the old models should be dropping in price and possibly going on closeout.