Moderator and barrel droop

Scored a Huggett Magna on ebay for cheap, for my FX Impact .30. It is Just a little quieter on max power. Noticeable reduction, but not outstanding. The thing is big and heavy. I wanted to see what it did for POI. At 100 yards it now shoots 4& 1/2 inches lower. I wasn't shooting for group size, but I'm not disappointed. Top group is stock moderator,bottom is the Huggett.

1545509266_8529056405c1e9992b787a5.43655927_hugget.jpg

 
I put a SUMO on my 700mm barreled Impact .25. POI dropped 7 mils at 75y. I put the Magna on and got more than half of that back and actually sounds a tad 'better' than the Sumo on this one. The magna feels lighter than the Sumo so that makes sense to me. Never really even tested accuracy with the Sumo - I didn't want to adjust my scope that much just to get on paper. BTW, these observations are compared to 5 (total) FX pieces, the Magna and the Sumo both required the fx to 1/2 unf adapter...
 
If you have a 3D printer you could print a support/spacer that maintains a consistent space between bottle and shroud.

1545512016_21218880935c1ea450179272.88212470_support.jpg

I suppose you could, but I think it's a bad idea. Barrel droop is not an accuracy issue anyway. It just changes POI. However, a support like you suggest could very well effect accuracy, as it would change barrel harmonics.
 
If you have a 3D printer you could print a support/spacer that maintains a consistent space between bottle and shroud.

I suppose you could, but I think it's a bad idea. Barrel droop is not an accuracy issue anyway. It just changes POI. However, a support like you suggest could very well effect accuracy, as it would change barrel harmonics.

I respectfully disagree since the barrel is floating inside the shroud. The rules that apply to solid barrel powder burners do not apply in this case.