Especially since that's a UTG scope![]()
![]()
Why so complicated?
Sight Hight = Exterior Scope diameter/2 + Barrel diameter/2 + distance between scope and barrel.
Does this also work with adjustable Scopemounts like eaglevision, Fx, sportsmatch and so on?
Why so complicated?
Sight Hight = Exterior Scope diameter/2 + Barrel diameter/2 + distance between scope and barrel.
There is something I don't understand about using ballistic software. I assume one would not go hunting, or go to a match, with only the results of the software to determine POI. In other words, you shoot to validate it, and my guess, it's never quite perfect. So, why not just shoot and take notes? An example might be the effect of wind. The effect of wind on a projectile can be mathematically determined with precision, no doubt. But, I''m not sure I've ever seen a wind condition that can be effectively used as input, because it's rarely a constant in time or distance. Years ago, I was active in BR competition, mostly centerfire. There was always a sea of wind flags on the range, and every shooter used them, mostly with slight variations. But ultimately, you observe the flags and, based on experience, make your best guess and take the shot. Sometimes I was perfect in my guess, sometimes drastically wrong. Obviously, I'm not a software user, and I'm sure it has advantages of which I am not aware.
Why so complicated?
Sight Hight = Exterior Scope diameter/2 + Barrel diameter/2 + distance between scope and barrel.
In fact, it only takes a minute for you to find the precise center distance.
Does this also work with adjustable Scopemounts like eaglevision, Fx, sportsmatch and so on?
Yes with adjustable mounts the back of the scope is jacked up the front is down, that's why you need the scope height at the end of the barrel.
Why so complicated?
Sight Hight = Exterior Scope diameter/2 + Barrel diameter/2 + distance between scope and barrel.
In fact, it only takes a minute for you to find the precise center distance.
What a name you have chosen, a number, well, I'll call you Pi, even if the number is not 3.14. I'm curios to see your results, can you compute the height with your method and then use the method nisouck proposed and share the results with us? I'm curios to see if we get different numbers.
Thanks!