Help me finding arguments to defend the Panthera.
Honestly I do not find any !!
For sure, we assume that what we see is truth..... If he is shooting at 100 yards instead of 300, well, nothing to show of.It's pretty cool how he edited out all the misses and the initial ranging. I wonder what the total shot count was for those hits? Good shooting, nonetheless, but if you didn't know any better, you'd think he just set up, got the yardage, dialed in the shot, and hit them.He did actually hit the last egg that was pretty cool.
Excellent reasoning based on the marketing and hype. I totally agree.I know little to nothing about FX guns other than what Ive watched and read, and have never shot or held one (so be gentle please)... I did watch this vid...
Reasons to get the Panthera over the Impact? can think of two: first it seems everyone who has an Impact spends a fair amount of time getting the gun dialled in to the levels of performance they are after Second, also seems that Impact owners buy another $1000 worth of goodies to either make it run the way they want/need or stiffen the frame up (ie Gerhard's big red Sabre rail on his Impact...)
the Panthera is supposed to be field ready out of the box. SO for me, not having to spend a weekend at the range tuning, then killing my budget completely to get the extra goodies is a plus. I should mention I am looking hard at this gun, for NRL22 and long distance gopher/starling blasting. So having it "ready to go" with only mounting the scope is appealing.