Expensive, heavy, ugly, and complicated = limited market appeal.
Same as the fx impact then?
Bb
If you find 7lbs heavy you need to step away from the keyboard and get some exercise. Dont even get me started on that ugly plastic stock.
Upvote 0
Expensive, heavy, ugly, and complicated = limited market appeal.
Same as the fx impact then?
Bb
"Ugly plastic stock". Are you referring to the Pulsar? Seems it has two nice laminate stocks available in addition to the "ugly plastic". Appearance, which seems to be the most subjective aspect of the gun, can be varied through choice of one of those laminated stocks instead of the plastic.
I like the look... IMHO, for the money, I'd skip the Pulsar and go with the Renegade. Same trigger, same barrel, same accuracy, same look, etc. You just don't have the electronic firing control system, and instead its mechanical like most other airguns.
IMHO, the Pulsar/RW platform is far superior to the Renegade.
Both have nice triggers, but the electronic valve control is awesome - very tight velocity SD's.
IMHO, the Pulsar/RW platform is far superior to the Renegade.
Both have nice triggers, but the electronic valve control is awesome - very tight velocity SD's.
Hi Fred, have you ever owned a Renegade? I'd be willing to bet the ES on a regulated Renegade with the Huma reg. is lower than the ES on a Pulsar/RW. I've owned three Renegades, and even without a reg. the ES was under 20 FPS. When I added a Huma to my Renegade (before you could buy the version with the Huma), my ES was always under 10 FPS for a 40 shot string, and most of the time around 5 or 6 FPS. I'm pretty sure the Pulsar/RW doesn't come in with an ES as good as that. Not that it makes much difference in accuracy as long as its under 15-ish, but since you pointed it out that it was superior, I thought I'd give my two cents based on experience, not supposition and conjecture... I recognize that it is your opinion, and you are certainly entitled to it...
@bandg
I didn't think the Renegade had an electronic trigger ("same trigger") but the electronic system in the Pulsar is what interests me the most.
- Yes, electronic trigger same as Pulsar and RW.
As noted, all very good information and appreciated. Looks like as far as one Daystate over the other (at least in this comparison), choosing one over the other may be difficult. In any event, seem like you both have excellent rifles and I bet you'll both enjoy the "ugly" things.Planning to have one or the other for myself soon.
As noted, all very good information and appreciated. Looks like as far as one Daystate over the other (at least in this comparison), choosing one over the other may be difficult. In any event, seem like you both have excellent rifles and I bet you'll both enjoy the "ugly" things.Planning to have one or the other for myself soon.
I own both a Pulsar and a Renegade and the Pulsar comes out ahead IMO. The Pulsar has 3 power levels, the Renegade has only one. The Renegade is unregulated so accuracy and consistency are better in the Pulsar. The Renegade's rear mechanical cocking feels heavy and stiff, while the Pulsar's is totally effortless and smooth as silk.
If you can afford it, I'd go with the Pulsar.