Interesting results! Less vertical stringing in the “formed skirt” target, as well as an apparently negligible change in horizontal stringing despite considerably more challenging wind conditions.
But I think this is where OldCrow would step in to point out the setup isn’t accurate enough to discern the differences associated with the pellets.
Crow
how did you collect this data?
Did I miss what kind of gun/barrel was used for the test?
Have been TRUING skirts for roundness for years now and shared my method & tools on numerous AG forums.
![]()
Not a flaring tool ... Skirt roundness truing only.
YES INDEED, A round pellet loads with less YAW error and fly straighter.
Sadly each individual pellet type / weight / caliber has a different skirt tail I.D. angle. When I made @ 6 different ones for the pellets and calibers currently being shot, it became an exercise in bumping the compound on the lathe a little at a time making a cut then trial fitting a specific pellet on it. Once they matched made a final tool for THAT PELLET and on it went many more time to get each right.
IMO no generic tool with some average angle with do this correctly. Either the angles too shallow and contact is made too deep, or angle too steep and you end up flaring the skirt.
Thus it makes such a tool very specific in shape to do the task with utmost uniformity.
Scott S
Have been TRUING skirts for roundness for years now and shared my method & tools on numerous AG forums.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Not a flaring tool ... Skirt roundness truing only.
YES INDEED, A round pellet loads with less YAW error and fly straighter.