I use tubes and solid state?Hmmmm... punch cards, manual dials and vacuum tubes Eh?
OK, back at you: Black & White TV, hand mowers and reel to reel tape decks!
Seems we're close to the same vintage
Cheers!
And all kinds of airguns!
Upvote 0
I use tubes and solid state?Hmmmm... punch cards, manual dials and vacuum tubes Eh?
OK, back at you: Black & White TV, hand mowers and reel to reel tape decks!
Seems we're close to the same vintage
Cheers!
It's obviously possible to do a bad job of designing and building a PCP, but a PCP really doesn't require the same level of precision to make well as does a springer. The proof of this is that your average self taught, amateur machinist can make a decent custom PCP just using a few off the shelf items and in all likelihood it will shoot well. Very few people are capable of making their own springer however and I'd wager that even fewer can make one you'd actually want to shoot.I don't know? My PCP needs the barrel removed and the chamfer cut. It's sharp edge cuts the pellet and instantly fouls the barrel. Then it shoots beautiful groups like this.
View attachment 566251
While it's apart I have to make modifications to the compensator, and shroud, to pass air more efficiently.
The trigger is coming around to being decent, but that has been bunch of trial and error. There's also a hammer to adjust. Did I mention that I fried one compressor already.
And yet a beautiful AirArms Pro Sport is only $1000, compare it to an FX or even a Leshiy. The Pro Sport, to my eye, looks a lot prettier and just feel that lovely wood stock.It's obviously possible to do a bad job of designing and building a PCP, but a PCP really doesn't require the same level of precision to make well as does a springer. The proof of this is that your average self taught, amateur machinist can make a decent custom PCP just using a few off the shelf items and in all likelihood it will shoot well. Very few people are capable of making their own springer however and I'd wager that even fewer can make one you'd actually want to shoot.
and floor model TVs with phonographs built in on top...and Rabit ears. UHF/VHFHmmmm... punch cards, manual dials and vacuum tubes Eh?
OK, back at you: Black & White TV, hand mowers and reel to reel tape decks!
Seems we're close to the same vintage
Cheers!
This is what I believe the angle should be on selling somebody on a springer. My impact quickly became a bench gun because it's no fun to carry at all and it did used to suffer from poi shift. What happened was my technique had to change and I had to have finer and finer resolution on adjustments to the point where I just park my truck and anything in a 150 yard radius is within reach.I've had PCP that would not shoot to the same spot the next day, those that the POI kept changing what seemed like every other moment, and then those that shot fantastic. My issue was the accurate ones were too heavy and low shot count plus the extra tanks and hassle of getting them filled and being tied to them when you needed to do a lot of shooting. I finally ditched all the PCP's and accessories and went back to all spring piston rifles . The spring piston rifles might not be as accurate but out to 50 yards sparrows don't care that I'm only using an R9 to kill them. I've had a few days that I've shot over a tin of pellets (500) at dairies, that would take a lot of air.
I don't get the fascination of under levers, especially for hunting. They are heavy, hard to load (nearly impossible for my 79 year old fingers), and adding a good scope makes them very heavy. That said, I still cling to my Beeman HW97. I had an HW98 that would shoot 3/8" groups at 50 yards on a good day. I use to line up .38 Special brass that I had picked up at the range and go 7 or 8 of 10 at 50 yards with it but I thought it was also too heavy for hunting. I find the R9/HW95 to be a great hunting rifle, especially for squirrel.This is what I believe the angle should be on selling somebody on a springer. My impact quickly became a bench gun because it's no fun to carry at all and it did used to suffer from poi shift. What happened was my technique had to change and I had to have finer and finer resolution on adjustments to the point where I just park my truck and anything in a 150 yard radius is within reach.
I miss the old days as a kid walking in the desert hills with a handy gun and doing my best to make a 30 yard shot, i still have the daisy break barrel and benjamin 392(the one that started air rifles for me... Not pistols).
The power and light weight that a springer offers is why I so badly want to be recommended a 20 cal (or one I can convert to 20)under or side lever. I just need you guys to point me in the right direction.
I just haven't been able to shoot any of the break barrels I own or have owned inside the standards I try to hold myself to. Basically I just don't want a swinging barrel, or the scope would have to be long eye relief and attached to the barrel. I'm no spring chicken anymore but I've got dexterity still at 40 and I'm still good at hiking weight around. Just not a billet behemoth of a 74 fpe 22 pcp.I don't get the fascination of under levers, especially for hunting. They are heavy, hard to load (nearly impossible for my 79 year old fingers), and adding a good scope makes them very heavy. That said, I still cling to my Beeman HW97. I had an HW98 that would shoot 3/8" groups at 50 yards on a good day. I use to line up .38 Special brass that I had picked up at the range and go 7 or 8 of 10 at 50 yards with it but I thought it was also too heavy for hunting. I find the R9/HW95 to be a great hunting rifle, especially for squirrel.
Im taking this to my old club, and the old rimfire competition that I used to be in the top 3 of for years, with the express intent of embarrassing some guys and getting air rifles an asterisk or banned from placing in the competitions.The price range that the OP mentioned really doesn’t contain the best examples of PCPs. Spend a little more and you end up with something that you can proudly show off at the PB range to the astonishment of those in attendance. I would never even consider breaking the barrel of one of my springers at the gun club. Those honorably defending Springlandia will call for my head for saying this but springers are not even in the same league. It probably doesn’t help that I have landed on .25 as my caliber of choice. Fire away with your reliability comments. Fact is I have replaced more broken springs than I have had PCP leaks. Luck? I can’t say but I do stay away from the more complex models. Technologies march on whether we want to admit it to our self or not. Pictured are my three .25s
View attachment 566369
I think the king of all the springers would be the Air Arms Pro Sport. Ticks all your points but price. I would own one if I could load it easily.I just haven't been able to shoot any of the break barrels I own or have owned inside the standards I try to hold myself to. Basically I just don't want a swinging barrel, or the scope would have to be long eye relief and attached to the barrel. I'm no spring chicken anymore but I've got dexterity still at 40 and I'm still good at hiking weight around. Just not a billet behemoth of a 74 fpe 22 pcp.
If a gun is reasonable on price and I don't like it, i give it to a younger kid that wants one. Now that my tastes have become more expensive, I'd need a gem of a springer
Thank you! Price is fine if it's good for my issues. At that price point I can't give that away.I think the king of all the springers would be the Air Arms Pro Sport. Ticks all your points but price. I would own one if I could load it easily.
Sure you could, I'd gladly accept it. I'd even come and get it.Thank you! Price is fine if it's good for my issues. At that price point I can't give that away.
They are heavy, but for long range plinking from the bench, they are a very entertaining challenge.I don't get the fascination of under levers, especially for hunting. They are heavy, hard to load (nearly impossible for my 79 year old fingers), and adding a good scope makes them very heavy. That said, I still cling to my Beeman HW97. I had an HW98 that would shoot 3/8" groups at 50 yards on a good day. I use to line up .38 Special brass that I had picked up at the range and go 7 or 8 of 10 at 50 yards with it but I thought it was also too heavy for hunting. I find the R9/HW95 to be a great hunting rifle, especially for squirrel.
The 97 loads easily from a sitting position, but I find it clumsy to load and shoot while out walking. That's when I'll take the 95.I think the king of all the springers would be the Air Arms Pro Sport. Ticks all your points but price. I would own one if I could load it easily.
That's mighty fine of you.Sure you could, I'd gladly accept it. I'd even come and get it.
whatever rocks your boat.I quality springer,which there are many can outshoot a pcp that costs about the same.
Yes ,I tested my theory yesterday,ok it is a generalization,never-the-less for me it holds true.
A $400-500 springer is more accurate that a $400-500 pcp...
I think why too many guys go with the pcp is because of the hype,or they may have a hard time cocking a springer,I see no other reasons.
A $500 pcp is just the start of the spending frenzy also. But Jesse a pcp is easier to shoot,you don't need as much skill;hold on Buster your going to get in trouble saying that
![]()