hw97k 177 vs diana 48 22.

1561930373_16351406575d192a857c9609.34723323_691B3A16-9F41-4F8A-97BA-7C40FABCAC63.jpeg
1561930374_5327995455d192a863cc854.68478258_C278C0CD-A160-49DA-BEAF-62D71FFD39BF.jpeg
so i recently purchased and am setting up a 48. i have owned a 97k for a while now and love it but wanted a dedicated squirrel gun. still breaking in the 48 so i guess i cant really judge yet but am hoping to get a accurate rifle out of her. using jsb for both guns. 18 gr. for the 48. the 97k has spoiled me a bit but am hoping ill be happy with the end result of the 48 break in regards to accuracy. anyone have both and thoughts on the matter? thanks. Walt 
 
Have had both and they each have their place. In .177 the HW really shines with serious FT accuracy. The 48 in .22 is a seriously, powerful hunting rifle. That said, I saw Mark Plough win the AAFTA Nationals in around 1990 with a bog standard RWS 48. They do shoot!

IMHO, Diana does not get the respect it deserves for producing durable, powerful and affordable springers. About a year ago I bought the Diana, .22 Mauser look-alike on a lark and was stunned by the smooth action, ergonomics and remarkable accuracy. The T-06 trigger was another surprise. It is not a Record, but ,certainly, fulfills a hunter's dreams. If current production 48s are of this quality you will be a very happy man. My old 48 loved Trophys and original, brown box Premiers ( no longer available). Both of my current RWS rifles (also have a 45 purchased in the early 80s) like Trophys and 13.9 gr AAs. You might want to give them a try. Always include them when testing a new .22 - and they often come out at or near the top for accuracy.

ENJOY!!.
 
Why is the HW97K not able to serve as a dedicated squirrel gun? I'm killing them (as pests) every week. I would think that the RWS 48 .22 is going to deliver more punch; but my .177 HW97K delivers laser accuracy--so long as I do my part. 



Best wishes,



Arch_E

This. My .177 is plenty powerful to get the job done. My Diana 48 is wonderful in .22, but the hw97k does the job you speak of!!
 
1561889445_12511983865d188aa51352b5.95114354_6E5D1F88-2C70-4282-91ED-D3A64262104B.jpeg
I agree that the 97 k can take squirrels, I have taken many, but I wanted a 22 for the extra power in case my shot is a bit off and still humane. I’m only about 1/3 the way through my first tin of jsb 18gr. So I know it’s not fully broken in but does not seem to be as accurate as I thought. Maybe I’m rushing to judgement. i was wondering if the 48 would be able to satisfy my accuracy requirement as well as the extra thump of energy. what type scope are folks using to stand up to the recoil? i purchased the combo kit but switched out the mantis scope for a hawke.. glass seemed not so great on the mantis. came with the droop mount that puts the scope a bit high but added a cheek riser and seems a great fit now. 
 
the 48 should be plenty powerful, and accurate enough, to fit your wants/needs.

i have a 52 and 54 both of which are highly accurate and powerful.

a critical factor here, though, is finding the correct pellet for your needs. i find heavier pellets perform better in my particular application (H&N Barracuda Match)

i find lighter pellets more accurate at close ranges and heavier domed/round nose pellets for longer ranges. 👍
 
I've found the Diana 48/52 (and even the 54) a bit hold sensitive, regardless of how they're tuned. The HW97s can be very hold insensitive, so perhaps you just need to experiment with how you're holding it? Diana's can have a great reputation for accuracy - but not quite on the same level as the 97 or TX200 to be honest. Still amazing accuracy, but you can get spoiled with a 97 😉. This being said, I'm not sure if a 97 would be as accurate as a 48 when setup to shoot close to 20fpe.

B.B. Pelletier reviewed the 48/52 and stated "These guns respond well to a tuneup. I like to lower their power by 10 percent and eliminate all the vibration, and then they are a real delight to shoot." I fully agree with this statement.
 
 

1561889445_12511983865d188aa51352b5.95114354_6E5D1F88-2C70-4282-91ED-D3A64262104B.jpeg
I agree that the 97 k can take squirrels, I have taken many, but I wanted a 22 for the extra power in case my shot is a bit off and still humane. I’m only about 1/3 the way through my first tin of jsb 18gr. So I know it’s not fully broken in but does not seem to be as accurate as I thought. Maybe I’m rushing to judgement. i was wondering if the 48 would be able to satisfy my accuracy requirement as well as the extra thump of energy. what type scope are folks using to stand up to the recoil? i purchased the combo kit but switched out the mantis scope for a hawke.. glass seemed not so great on the mantis. came with the droop mount that puts the scope a bit high but added a cheek riser and seems a great fit now.



My favorites are my vortex diamondback 2-7x 35 And 3-9 x 40. Seem to hold up very well, hold zero fantastic, have clear optics, and a no hassle VIP warrantee on that rare case.....
 
I have both. The 52 is turned to right at 14.5 ft/lb and is tremendously accurate albeit a little tough on scopes.

The 97 is a sub 12ft/lb and is just a joy to shoot but is much more wind sensitive and with a much narrower zero range.

I primarily shoot the 97 now and considered selling the 52 but just couldn't bring myself to do it, it really is a great shooting rifle.
 
Nice kill!



The HW95 is 1.3 lbs lighter than the HW97, plus it has a lighter scope--making the 95 nearly 2lbs lighter. This makes all the difference to me when I'm shooting off-hand. While both the 95 and 97 are superb shooting guns, I'm not physically capable of controlling my tremble with an 11 lb gun. With the HW95, I can aim and hit what I'm sighting, when off-hand. 



IMO, just enjoy whatever you've got.



Arch_E