You get the wrong idea, I really like the gun and I'm sure it will shoot great, that doesn't mean that you can't spot a lot of things on a gun just looking at it and examine the design.
My main complain externally is the extra lenght that takes the handle, the others are just details that can be easily patched.
Internally, yes, I complain about the not so shock proof safe mechanism, but if you want to prove me wrong, please make a video bashing your GK1 on a table with the safe engaged, so people can see if the thing pass a standard pistol safety test. Well... my instructor do the same with a cooked, unloaded semi-auto with external hammer to demonstrate the safety of the gun, and the damn thing discharged anyway... but with a semi-auto, you can just carry it with no round on the chamber, and with a revolver or even a standard airgun with a hammer that strikes the valve, it's much more unlikelly to discharge accidentally.
But with the GK1... Tell me that you will feel safe taking it to a hunt or just to the range, loaded and attached to your waist or something.
Will you run with it? will you go trough the wilderness with it feeling safe?
What can I say.. I would have prefered that the safe on the GK1 was a big thing actually bloquing the rear of the mooving rood so it can't, no matter what, accidentally shoot you with the safe engaged if you trip to the ground or something accidentally hit the gun.