In reading bconlon’s very first post, I feel a point many are missing is that a refund was requested and was not given. I do understand that FX has offered a substitution, but that’s not what was bought and paid for. While the color difference may be insignificant to some, it obviously isn’t to bconlon or the substitution would have been accepted. The rifle was defective on delivery, it’s been over 3 months trying to get it resolved and no exact timeframe has been given on when this will get resolved. I think it’s completely reasonable to request a refund and be given one under the circumstances that have been explained by bconlon and confirmed by FX.
In reading bconlon’s very first post, I feel a point many are missing is that a refund was requested and was not given...
I think it’s completely reasonable to request a refund and be given one under the circumstances that have been explained by bconlon and confirmed by FX.
+1
I did miss that from the first post and I agree. I hope he is provided a refund if that is his preferred resolution.
However a refund is not something that FX can give. The rifle was not purchased from FX. That would be something between bconlon and the retailer, who if I recall correctly, was Baker Airguns. It seems to me that FX is offering what they can, namely a substitute product. bashing them for that doesn’t make sense to me. Saying I want my money back, which I understand, is between the purchaser and the seller.
By the way, this is the same for most products that I can think of. If you buy something on Amazon and you want a refund because you are not happy (far any reason) you deal with Amazon, not with the manufacturer since it was Amazon that sold you the goods.
Upvote 0