Haha, the irony here is pretty sweet. You seem to have overlooked the "generally speaking" portion to counter with an anecdote, meanwhile fresh in my memory is you accusing everyone of having reading comprehension issues in the related topic on GTA just two days ago. We know you're a smart guy so I won't insult you with such an incendiary swipe, but come on. That is the least charitable interpretation that can be taken and it does not promote a healthy dialog.
And you wish to characterize my response as baseless with the full knowledge that we were just discussing this topic in detail here?
https://www.gatewaytoairguns.org/GTA/index.php?topic=174561 That has no useful purpose other than to provoke and it demonstrates a willingness to be dishonest in the pursuit of it.
If my generalization is wrong, I trust you will explain to us how a regulator optimized for fast recovery has an advantage in terms of the consistency of its output pressure. Not how one regulator works great but how it is a useful design strategy such that maximizing recovery rate will improve consistency. For starters, it runs counter to your central argument regarding how it helps augment the plenum during the shot cycle. There will necessarily be a varying operating pressure that moves up and down as the reservoir rises and falls. It will not be visible on a plenum gauge because it is an instantaneous effect of the hammer knocking the valve open so it would be easy to be unaware of it, and the extent to which it affects the ES is of course dependent on a dozen other factors so I am by no means asserting that it will produce poor results, just simply that it is not advantageous to a stable operating pressure. We've all tuned conventional PCPs so we know it is quite possible to hold a tight ES over the span of a few hundred PSI.
Anyway I'm here to share information, but more than that I'm here to learn. If I'm wrong, I don't want to wallow in ignorance. I suspect motorhead and rsterne would love to be set straight on this topic as well.