FX Chronograph vs Caldwell Precision Chronograph - FX was always slower.

Well, I was looking for any excuse to do some shooting today and figured I'd shoot my new .22 Benjamin Marauder pistol (P-rod) with my FX chronograph hanging on the barrel at the same time I shot over my Caldwell Precision Chronograph.

As some may know, the new P-rod is a replacement for one that wouldn't hold air overnight. I'm still in the process of trying to seal the older one.

ANYWAY,

Here a synopsis of what I found out. The FX chrony always recorded a slower speed than the Caldwell, proportionally, it seemed. When the Caldwell reported a higher than average velocity, so did the FX and vice versa.

Here's the data:

The first table is when I shot JSB Diabolo Exact Jumbo Monster 25.39 pellets. When I weighed 10 of them, they averaged 25.07 gr, not 25.39.

The numbers for the Caldwell are on the left and those for the FX are on the right.

Screen Shot 2021-05-04 at 6.58.44 PM.1620169172.png


The second table is when I shot Benjamin Discovery PCP 14.3 gr pellets. When I weighed 10 of them, they averaged 14.36 gr, not 14.3.

14.3.1620165376.png


I don't have a clue as to which one on my chronographs is the more accurate one, I guess I'll go with the Caldwell. because the numbers make me happier.

You reckon a squirrel could tell which gun fired the pellet that hit it in the head? - probably not, dead is dead.

Bobby
 
Are you sure the Caldwell isn't reading fast? It's a perspective thing I guess. With the fx app you can add or subtract 1 or 2% you can get them to align better if you choose.

I don't know if the Caldwell is reading fast or not. I do know about adding / subtract 1 or 2% to the FX. But since the differences seem small to me, and the Caldwell is my "goto" chronograph, I'm not going to worry with the FX.

It was fun running this little test, though.
 
It's a pretty small difference, so I wouldn't worry too much about it. I've seen similar differences between Pact, CED and Oehler. Labradar tracks with Oehler pretty well, and I consider it "the standard" - but just pick one to trust and you should still see differences as appropriate.

GsT

Agreed. I wonder if I can conclude, "The heavier the pellet, the smaller the difference."?


 
Are you sure the Caldwell isn't reading fast? It's a perspective thing I guess. With the fx app you can add or subtract 1 or 2% you can get them to align better if you choose.

Exactly. Changes/consistency seem more important than absolute values in this case. And what is the absolute difference? About 1.5%?

For the 14.36 gr pellets the absolute difference in velocity is 1.33% more from the Caldwell chrony. (0.01332734).

For the 25.07 gr pellets the absolute difference in velocity is 1.15% more from the Caldwell chrony. (0.011476366).
 
Call me crazy but aren't those speeds alittle slow for a Mrod?

Dairyboy, nope, you're not crazy, I was shooting my P-rod, not my M-rod, duh to me (besides my M-rod is .177, not even .22). I can't believe I did that. I was thinking hard, making sure my numbers were correct, and mistakenly called my Marauder pistol a Marauder rifle.

Thanks, for calling it to my attention. I went back and edited the text so that now it reads "P-rod". But now, readers won't know what you were speaking of, maybe after they will read this string they'll know what I did.

So for all you readers getting here late, in my first string, I said that I was shooting my M-rod, but I wasn't, I was shooting my P-rod.