Debating between the two different chronograph the FX and Labradar. I shot at night and indoors so I don’t want to use a prochrono style chrono. I know there is a price difference but I’d rather buy it once and not worry about it. Any suggestions?
I just set my chronograph downrange right in front of the target with the sky screens forming an triangle around the bullseye. I know it's risky - either I'm a good shot or just a lucky shot (maybe a little bit of both), because I haven't ever hit the chrono. GOTTA FIND SOME WOOD TO KNOCK ON, NOW.
I have them both, the main advantage of the LR is velocity data over programmable distances. However, the LR is a bit more finicky with 22 cal and smaller projectiles (especially slugs). I cannot always trust the MV info, and it sometimes doesn't register the shots (using doppler detection). I haven't tried the external mic options though).
The FX chrono can also be finicky with registering shots, but I found that I can trust the data 100% of the time that it picks them up.
Also, my LR has been terrible with velocity readings past 25 meters - more so when the humidity is above ~50%., but I have had a lot of issues getting data even for larger 30 cal projectiles.
I just set my chronograph downrange right in front of the target with the sky screens forming an triangle around the bullseye. I know it's risky - either I'm a good shot or just a lucky shot (maybe a little bit of both), because I haven't ever hit the chrono. GOTTA FIND SOME WOOD TO KNOCK ON, NOW.
You can place a steel plate between the chrono and you. That is a good idea even with a traditional chrony...many use a thick plexy glass to protect the LCD display, etc..