FOCUS or PARALLAX ?
Short,
quick answer
FOCUS.
Parallax does not actually exist within the realms of rifle scope / telescope optics and Parallax 'Error' does not exist. (Full Stop / Period). The term parallax error applies to a certain rare situation within the highly specialized & critical world of camera optics - increasingly rare these days anyway.
Dont get me wrong here, Parallax exists as a phenomenon (in fact our cave dwelling forebears will have noticed it!*) but it doesn't exist within the body of the scope/telescope, its purely a function of 1 of 3 factors moving out of alignment to quite a gross degree - barring
very crummy threading of an AO mech., that leaves the Human Eyeball Mk 1.
In 'pure' Optics our scopes consist of a stacked series of lenses (which are referred to as planes) for one of these planes to go off axis sufficiently for the human eye to notice, or make for more than a fraction of a Mill-radian at 1000 metres, requires serious incompetence from the maker of that scope. (I have seen the possible 'Friday Afternoon' scope or dodgy quick-fix Dedicated NV sight where the front lens wandered around, but in the first case it was production issue). This is all purely WITHIN the scope body itself.
Parallax 'Error' in the world we live in is HUMAN ERROR, Parallax is just Mathematics (
its not either Naughty or Mischievous - unlike us Humans).
For a scope to function correctly at
differing ranges/distances (distances to the Object of view or target) the Focal Plane Lens is required to move either forward or back to bring that Object image into the sharpest focus on the area/plane the users' eye is already focussing upon
within the scope,
the reticle, (if you've set the scope up correctly).
The statement 'Focal Plane Lens' might give the alert reader a clue here !! Assuming the other 2 elements have stayed
exactly in position when the Focal Lens is moved all will be well.
(& lets discount the theory the the reticle is composed of some amorphous, moving group of atoms!). So, what could possibly go wrong ???
Its the good old "Dumkopf Factor" - either the first stage of setting-up your scope to YOUR EYES, the Ocular Adjustment, has not been done correctly (Eye to Reticle adjustment), Or the Object (target at distance, whatever) is not completely focussed upon the reticle plane, or,
most likely, YOU'VE MOVED YOUR HEAD !!
So, what are people on about ???
The scope makers who quote phrases like "Parallaxes down to", Parallax Adjustment Knob" or "our factory can Re-Parallax your scope to..." are talking drivel and a few have been at it for years. Sadly (to me) this has been taken-up by a few amongst us in the shooting world for whom the term Parallax has now become interchangeable with Range (or distance) or inconsistent head position. IT ISN'T EITHER, NEVER WAS and its
sloppy thinking.
Scope makers,
however august, are commercial enterprises -
they seek to sell stuff, buddy !
* Parallax for juniors

(OH! & cavemen -
how are ya doin buddy?)
close one eye then line up a finger tip with an object about 5-6 feet away, keeping your finger & head still, close that one eye and open the other - its not pointing in the same place !!