• The AGN App is ready! Search "Airgun Nation" in your App store. To compliment this new tech we've assigned the "Threads" Feed & "Dark" Mode. To revert back click HERE.

External ballistics question about non wind-induced drift....slugs specifically.

I have been using this gizmo for a few years and it seems to work very well. I’m not a competitive shooter, outside of biathlon, but my Pantheras hold up at 100+

I somehow understand how this alignment tool(s) works....😂....will probably pick one up! Works like a plumb bob and lets one know if the barrel is aligned with reticle.
 
20230315_141548.jpg


20221112_151954.jpg


20221112_152043.jpg
 
I did not read all the replies so sorry if it was mentioned before.

With right-hand twist barrels, bullets and slugs will spindrift to the right. Pellets will spindrift to the left. I had the same query but then read on a few websites about it. I don't have links now so you can do a search. How much will depend on many factors like bullet/pellet shape, BC, twist rate, speed and most importantly, position of Center of Gravity vs Center of Pressure.

So, at 60 yards the path curve is already there. When I had my rifle shooting pellets, zeroed at 25 meter, it would always impact to the left at 50 meter, in zero wind conditions. Only a little but visible. When I then zeroed at 50 meter, the impact at 25 meter would be 5mm to the right. At 25 meter my rifle is one holing so it is easy to see the difference. At longer distances in zero wind conditions it is more noticeable but it is seldom that I have absolute zero wind conditions.
 
I did not read all the replies so sorry if it was mentioned before.

With right-hand twist barrels, bullets and slugs will spindrift to the right. Pellets will spindrift to the left. I had the same query but then read on a few websites about it. I don't have LINKS now so you can do a search.


Here is a LINK!

By ballistician Miles Morris, on HardAir Magazine's forum:

 
Use either scope leveling tool and it may or may not work. It takes some things for granted. After being burned by the wheeler long ago ...I switched to the zero and near distance method I already described. It never fails because you are actually using poi results to align your reticle. The mirror method has failed me as well.

Mike
 
  • Like
Reactions: bigHUN
Use either scope leveling tool and it may or may not work. It takes some things for granted. After being burned by the wheeler long ago ...I switched to the zero and near distance method I already described. It never fails because you are actually using poi results to align your reticle. The mirror method has failed me as well.

Mike
zero and near distance method I already described . where please , it is not in this thread . Thanks Stan
 
I am using that my diy 3d printed tool to set the bubble only.... and btw me shooting of the bench only so with consistency I am on safe side.
My Impact MK2 has a "floating" picatiny rail, after every deeper surgery I must do the 20 <-> 100 drill there and back until it hits the same vertical.
But lucky me, after a year or so playing FX mechanic finally I settled with a fixed distance/amo and didn't had to move that rail since last summer :)
A good learning curve tho, you folks shall taste it ;)
 
If all the pellets are grouping at the same location to the right I have a hard time believing the scope cant issue. the shorter ranges would typically be to the left in that instance. Coriolis effect at 100 yards is hard to believe.
Coriolis is mostly a concern for the infantry cannon distances shot.

If you want to test if there is any Coriolis effect, shoot to the other direction and see if it go the same direction. If it still go right as it most probably will, you have your answer. That means Coriolis has not effect.
 
Stretched it back out yesterday evening (171 yards this time).

This is after the mirror trick, and the shooting close trick, and the plumb bomb trick, and the etc etc etc trick. Readjusted the bubble level on the gun so that I know when the bubble level is good, my vertical crosshair is truly vertical.

So, first shot @ 171 drifted right again, off the paper. Maybe 12-15inches? and only basing that on the fact that it hit that woven wire fence (like it did the first attempt at 170+ a few weeks ago) and threw some shrapnel back into my cardboard. I did see the woven wire vibrate when hit, but hard to pinpoint exactly where hit. Adjusted it to the left so that I could shoot my groups. Wind was pretty dang minimal. Very slight headwind, and only on some of the shots. I'd guess most shots were no wind, but I could feel a gentle push straight in from the target on some of the shots, couldn't have been more than 2-3mph at it's peak, and it wasn't peaking very often.

I think spin drift.
 
Stretched it back out yesterday evening (171 yards this time).

This is after the mirror trick, and the shooting close trick, and the plumb bomb trick, and the etc etc etc trick. Readjusted the bubble level on the gun so that I know when the bubble level is good, my vertical crosshair is truly vertical.

So, first shot @ 171 drifted right again, off the paper. Maybe 12-15inches? and only basing that on the fact that it hit that woven wire fence (like it did the first attempt at 170+ a few weeks ago) and threw some shrapnel back into my cardboard. I did see the woven wire vibrate when hit, but hard to pinpoint exactly where hit. Adjusted it to the left so that I could shoot my groups. Wind was pretty dang minimal. Very slight headwind, and only on some of the shots. I'd guess most shots were no wind, but I could feel a gentle push straight in from the target on some of the shots, couldn't have been more than 2-3mph at it's peak, and it wasn't peaking very often.

I think spin drift.
Spin drift won’t be 12” at 171yd. Maybe a couple of inches. 3mph wind could do it with a pellet or low BC slug.
 
Spin drift won’t be 12” at 171yd. Maybe a couple of inches. 3mph wind could do it with a pellet or low BC slug.

The "I think" part of that was b/c all the scope futzing didn't resolve it.

Dunno the exact reason, but rightward drift is pronounced. Wind flags at 30 and 100 yards were hanging straight down for a good percentage of the shots, could just barley feel a hint of "wind" coming at my face during this session , and only on some of the shots. I'd call it more of a thermal rolling up and out of the creek than wind.

What tiny hint of wind I had the last time on paper at this same location was from behind me. So two completely different winds, and rightward drift for both sessions.

In various locations at various pdog towns over various days and various directions, impact point always further right as distance increases. Zero for 60 yards is not impacting right of aim point.

It just does it, very predictably, which is the best kind of DOPE to account for (the predictable kind).
 
The drift doesn't seem to be a stability issue, because they're consistently drifting. Ie I can make em go where I want, if I account for that drift like I account for trajectory arc. Seems if they were losing stability the impact points wouldn't be reliable.

But your underlying implication that slower may drift more is interesting.
Slower fps= more flight time so more time to drift at least that's my theory
 
If you rotated your scope significantly as you implied....it's not possible that you can obtain the same results unless something else has changed.

Which way did your scope end up turned compared to your original setting?

Mike

Hard to say with absolute certainty b/c I messed with the scopes orientation in four different sessions, spread over the last 10ish days.

First big adjustment was scope going counterclockwise, from shooter position. That was an overadjustment so in the second futzing I went back clockwise maybe 1/2? of the first first rotation. Third and fourth adjustments werent as big of rotational jumps.


The "best" combination of mirror test, close and far impact points, and the plumb bomb puts the rifle canted quite a bit more than it was before all of this craziness. It seems the rifle MUST be canted to get the scope at true vertical while also keeping impact points intersecting s vertical line at near and far (55yards) distances.

Just before the recent 171yards session with slugs, I shot 10, 30, and 55 yards with the sub20fpe tune (pellets, not slugs) and the impact points are lining up on the vertical at those three distances. This was using the scopes same orientation from a few days prior (4th scope futzing).

I'm not touching it again. It does what it does, impact point drifting further and further right as distance increases.
 
I assume you’re clicking to the 171yds distance? Do you get the same amount of drift when using hold-over?

Have you tried switching to a different scope or rings? Same results?

Is the scope FFP? Have you tried a SFP scope?

Does the same drift occur with all projectiles you’ve tried?

When you’re clicking to the further distances, is there a point when the drift begins or is it gradual? How close to the max click travel are you? Could the erector tube be coming in contact with something inside the tube?

Grasping at ideas…