.
Yeah because calling it pellet guns implies they were only designed to shoot pellets. Sure theres many of those and yeah they would probably not shoot well.
However times have changed and many guns are designed with this in mind. Gauntlets, avengers, edguns, daystate, fx etc. Calling them air rifles opens up to a more honest response more reflective of current state of air guns. All IMO of course.
I don't think I can agree with that. Lol if people are really swayed to answering honestly if someone says pellet gun vs air rifle then those people likely have other issues to deal with and how do you know if there answering honestly at all either way? I'd also venture to say still the majority of airguns are designed to shoot pellets first with some recently also for slugs being possible and also very much capable of shooting them very well. But calling them a pellet rifle is now a wrong way to call them?
I think what Centercut is talking about are the pellet guns so to speak. People buying whatever brand of gun and thinking they'll shoot airgun slugs. I don't think FX or Daystate could fall under those as I know they've tested slugs in there guns alot. Matt Dubber and slug barrels and FXs Hybrids. Daystate with the ART team with ART barrels and now the Howler slugs. But say Taipans, Crickets, Vulcans, Uragans, and other brands (not sure why only bullpups are in my head at the moment but I'm blanking lol) I'm sure are designed as pellet guns. Barrels are optimized for pellets.
Just cause my crappie jig catches bass and bluegill with regularity doesn't mean it can't be called a crappie jig anymore.
I could be way off in my thinking though. I mean no offense or disrespect at all towards you just trying to explain my thinking.
Same towards you @bandg no offense or disrespect meant. Just explaining my thinking was all.