I have quite a few airguns including half a dozen FX PCPs ranging from my first, a Royale 500, to a recently acquired DRS. I shoot them all in stock factory configuration and have never felt the need to chase upgrades and accessories, I buy what I need. Have an Impact MK2 and have been very happy with the performance.
Don't think that FX is "predatory", they advertise like most companies do. Is it bad that they're successful?
Waiting for any new product to be proven is good advice, and, yeah, competition and new models will often reduce pricing... if other factors don't force increases. In checking several airgun sites, FX pricing seems to be competitive with similar models from other vendors.
I for one, appreciate that FX is constantly improving their products to keep in step with customer demands.
For example, my take on the FX Impacts is that the original started out as a 33 fpe (in .22) pellet gun. The MK2 was released as a pellet gun with increased power (45 fpe) for shooting slugs. The MK3 is a slug gun that shoots pellets and the MK4 is primarily a slug gun. Flexibility in configuration, tunability and serious increase in power. FX could have just coasted on their laurels (my new AA S510 has not seen a real performance improvement since it was a S400 - just the name and some cosmetic changes) but made changes as needed to stay current.
Just my two cents.
Cheers!