Healthservices. All True. I guess I'm having trouble due to observation (3 years, no water in the tank), and more than that, I question the efficiency of the desiccant itself. Several years ago when the Yong Hengs first came out, there were extensive discussions about drying the air before it goes into the tank. The "Molecular" sieve was a hot topic, with one poster claimed that unless you actually know how to pack the molecular sieve correctly, doesn't matter as air and water will simply bypass the desiccant (molecular sieve) and happily go straight into the tank.
Perhaps, I'll take my filter and fill it, pack it tight with desiccant beads that change color when wet, and see if they ever change color. That combined with filling my guppy tank, then immediately depressurizing and inspecting the tank might be the only true ways to determine what my risks are. Haven't done either yet, so while I can pontificate all day, until I run the experiment, there's no evidence to validate one way or another. It's all speculation.
By the way, my job (got in by accident so don't hold it against me). I'm an auditor. As they say in the profession, if it isn't written down, it didn't happen.
I've got some chrony work to do, so rather than refill the tank immediately, I'll depressurize and see if any water is in the tank. I believe humidity was in the 15 -20%% range the day i filled that tank. Since I followed normal procedures of bleeding every few minutes, the air should be "normal" for my operation. Might be a few days before I do it, but I'll let you know how it turns out. If there's no water in the tank, I may not do the desiccant bead experiment to see how long they last. And if simply packing the tube incorrectly compromises the desiccant, that experiment might not be valid anyway.
Good conversation here.
Perhaps, I'll take my filter and fill it, pack it tight with desiccant beads that change color when wet, and see if they ever change color. That combined with filling my guppy tank, then immediately depressurizing and inspecting the tank might be the only true ways to determine what my risks are. Haven't done either yet, so while I can pontificate all day, until I run the experiment, there's no evidence to validate one way or another. It's all speculation.
By the way, my job (got in by accident so don't hold it against me). I'm an auditor. As they say in the profession, if it isn't written down, it didn't happen.
I've got some chrony work to do, so rather than refill the tank immediately, I'll depressurize and see if any water is in the tank. I believe humidity was in the 15 -20%% range the day i filled that tank. Since I followed normal procedures of bleeding every few minutes, the air should be "normal" for my operation. Might be a few days before I do it, but I'll let you know how it turns out. If there's no water in the tank, I may not do the desiccant bead experiment to see how long they last. And if simply packing the tube incorrectly compromises the desiccant, that experiment might not be valid anyway.
Good conversation here.
Upvote 0