Warning, do not try this at home, I am a TRAINED PROFESSIONAL.
Had my Maverick .22 Compact on my 'shooting bench' i.e. my patio table, thought I'd do something brilliant and put my umbrella into the table, table shook a little and down went the gun, call it a drop test. 30" give or take. Landed on the barrel then the scope. I shall not repeat what I said but you can guess. Checked the scope, no apparent damage but who knows, went to insert a mag and....NOT HAPPENING. Upon further inspection the barrel pushed back agains the piece that locates the barrel for proper depth and bent out the aluminum about .006", it also wedged the barrel, so loosened up the set screws, took a piece of wood and a soft hammer and gently tapped the barrel out then pulled it out. Took a fine file and started removing material to get the mag in. THEN used the mag as a depth gage and reset the barrel. Test firing, pellets went exactly were they were suppose to at 30 yards.
Results of the destructive testing, and I'll leave it to the engineers to calculate the forces involved but, the barrel didn't bend and the Arken doesn't doesn't appear to be worse for the impact test.
Next will be, do I live with it or see if the FX warranty will cover stupidity.
addendum, those expensive wide stance bi-pods aren't stable enough.
addendum 2 It seems that the delicacy of the barrels of FX airguns is vastly overstated.
Had my Maverick .22 Compact on my 'shooting bench' i.e. my patio table, thought I'd do something brilliant and put my umbrella into the table, table shook a little and down went the gun, call it a drop test. 30" give or take. Landed on the barrel then the scope. I shall not repeat what I said but you can guess. Checked the scope, no apparent damage but who knows, went to insert a mag and....NOT HAPPENING. Upon further inspection the barrel pushed back agains the piece that locates the barrel for proper depth and bent out the aluminum about .006", it also wedged the barrel, so loosened up the set screws, took a piece of wood and a soft hammer and gently tapped the barrel out then pulled it out. Took a fine file and started removing material to get the mag in. THEN used the mag as a depth gage and reset the barrel. Test firing, pellets went exactly were they were suppose to at 30 yards.
Results of the destructive testing, and I'll leave it to the engineers to calculate the forces involved but, the barrel didn't bend and the Arken doesn't doesn't appear to be worse for the impact test.
Next will be, do I live with it or see if the FX warranty will cover stupidity.
addendum, those expensive wide stance bi-pods aren't stable enough.
addendum 2 It seems that the delicacy of the barrels of FX airguns is vastly overstated.