I'm seriously considering one of Connect scopes. What are the advantages and disadvantages between the two versions of the scope?
Seems to me the 32 might be a bit brighter in low light due to the larger objective.
I read somewhere that the 24 may offer better depth of field and therefore might be better for using the scope for 'ranging'.
Mainly I target shoot and plink. Light is normally pretty good and field of view is perhaps less important to me than it might be to hunters.
I'm planning to mount the scope on my Air Arms S200 but I might want to put in on my HW35. I don't think of the HW35 as a heavy recoil but the Connect scopes say they're for "non-recoiling rifles". Would the Connect be compatible for use on the HW35?
Thanks for advice or input, particularly from anyone who has direct experience with the MTC Connect scopes.
Matt
Seems to me the 32 might be a bit brighter in low light due to the larger objective.
I read somewhere that the 24 may offer better depth of field and therefore might be better for using the scope for 'ranging'.
Mainly I target shoot and plink. Light is normally pretty good and field of view is perhaps less important to me than it might be to hunters.
I'm planning to mount the scope on my Air Arms S200 but I might want to put in on my HW35. I don't think of the HW35 as a heavy recoil but the Connect scopes say they're for "non-recoiling rifles". Would the Connect be compatible for use on the HW35?
Thanks for advice or input, particularly from anyone who has direct experience with the MTC Connect scopes.
Matt