Until a month ago the best 100 yard airgun accuracy I've gotten in testing hundreds of airguns was with a Chinese-made, $459 .30 AEA Challenger-
And to show that was no fluke-
Mind you, I had not only tuned the gun down from monster power to 'only' 80 foot pounds, but also polished the bore and muzzle-crown.
But a month ago my $3000, .25 Daystate Red Wolf with Lothar Walther barrel bettered the .81" c-t-c AVERAGE accuracy of the Chinese AEA by posting this
.70" average at 100 yards (I think that half-inch group is the best I've ever gotten)-
Other examples of an extremely accurate Chinese barrel, in this case a .177 QB78 barrel produced a quarter-century ago, is this .29" c-t-c five shot group at 50 yards shot from stool and bipod in light crosswinds-
And this .58" c-t-c ten-shot group shot from the same position, also in light crosswind conditions-
By the way,
Crosman produced wonderfully-accurate barrels in the 1950s and 60s for their $20 airguns. In this case a Crosman 187 Co2 rifle converted to AIR PISTOL; the rifle barrel chopped with a hack-saw, and re-crowned with rotary-tool bits. Five consecutive five-shot groups at 50 yards averaged .66" c-t-c in outdoor conditions! Two subsequent accuracy testing sessions of five consecutive five-shot groups at 50 yards both averaged .67" c-t-c, so this photo is also no fluke-
A point not to be overlooked in this post is the fact none of these averages equalled any of these barrels accuracy potentials, considering there was some amount of human error and outdoor wind conditions in every case. Even more human error in the QB barrel groups shot from the stool-and-bipod Hunter Class field target position.
Another point is Crosman produced barrels over a half-century ago that shoot as well a virtually any that modern manufacturing and marketing can muster nowadays; and the Chinese have done the same for the last quarter-century.
Just sayin'.
.