EDgun Based on the thread "L2 explouse in UK".

No. What's shocking is how little evidence of corrosion is visible on the surface which makes this problem hard to detect to an average L2 owner.
If we believe this to be the root cause, then ANY amount of aluminum oxide visible in the tube makes it highly suspect and potentially unsafe to use.
if corrosion was indeed the root cause. and if. it was then as i mention prier almost all gun manufators now become a concern.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dorcula
Okay here's some of my thoughts on this. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

I fail to see how this is a satisfactory conclusion in any way. From what I understand, corrosion was likely the main culprit, right? The report states that the tube fractured at the corroded part of the tube. Ed's answer to this, is basically: Only fill this gun with air from these very specific places not everyone has access to, like fire departments and scuba shops. Furthermore, EdGun will continue the status quo, and produce the airtubes in the same manner.

I'm sorry but... what?! May I remind you that the vast majority of L2 owners are NOT on forums like these. They see these guns in a shop somewhere, think it looks cool, and will probably get basic hand pump or small compressor to boot. A lot of retailers recommend these small compressors to their customers, because they are relatively cheap and easy to use. A lot of them have moisture filters too, though they are not perfect. The avarage Joe is not going to pay regular visits to the local fire department to get a refill, and the safety of your product should not rely on that.

Yes, we know moisture inside your PCP should be avoided. But if it happens, it should AT MOST have a negative effect on the longevity of your gun. Not lead to a catastrophic and potentially lethal failure!

I am no engineer by any means, but aren't there coatings or other processes to prevent alluminum from corroding? Couldn't the walls and corner radiuses (radii?) be made just a tad thicker to make absolutely sure this can never happen again? Any extra measures at all? Heck, if you don't want to do a recall and lose money as a company, I'd happily pay 100 bucks for an improved airtube if it means I get to shoot my L2 AND keep my face intact.

I really don't understand why people are okay with this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loff and Smitty911
If we believe this to be the root cause, then ANY amount of aluminum oxide visible in the tube makes it highly suspect and potentially unsafe to use.
Any aluminum thing has thin lay of aluminum oxide, that protects one's of corrosion. Anodizing increases this lay, consequently increases corrosion resistance. Aluminum oxide is our friend. But there are some aggressive environments, where aluminum oxide can't resistant. At least for anodizingless. Also excessive surfaces roughness reduces corrosion resistance. As you increase roughness you reduce corrosion resistance.
In those places, where contact O-rings with surfaces, manufacturers have to remove anodized lay to prevent air leak. Because anodized surface has porous structure. But surfaces which contact with o-rings must have roughness, that looks like mirror. Ra1.6 as worst. Probability of corrosion due to moisture air in this case is insignificant.
But if surface has been obtained with rough tool, without anodizing or poor anodized, in moisture environment it will corrode soon or later.
What will happen if corrosion begins on the tension concentrator under pressure? What way you think?
On the pic below my stock reservoir inside.

IMG_20230831_170204.jpg
 
Last edited:
May I remind you that the vast majority of L2 owners are NOT on forums like these. They see these guns in a shop somewhere, think it looks cool
Totally agree with you. So i before.
Yes, we know moisture inside your PCP should be avoided.
unfortunately it is not always possible.
It's why high pressure reservoir must be not only cool-looking outside, it must have well-engineered geometry and other metrics inside. Including anti-corrosion treatment, surface roughness e.t.c.
I am no engineer by any means, but aren't there coatings or other processes to prevent alluminum from corroding?
In our case anti-corrosion treatment by anodizing exists mostly on the outer surfaces. But not for prevent corrosion, it's just for pretty looking. This is good, no doubt. But, as we can see, manufacturer doesn't care anti-corrosion treatment of inner surfaces. In combination with tension concentrator, poor roughness, we obtain time-bomb as result. In my opinion.
But as Ed says in russuan "i give a f*ck anybody's opinion".
PS: I'm relative to airgun production in Russia to. Ed has full right to say that this is preconceived notion.
Sorry for my not prefect English if it occurs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stubbers
...The report states that the tube fractured at the corroded part of the tube. .... Only fill this gun with air from these very specific places not everyone has access to, like fire departments and scuba shops..... EdGun will continue the status quo, and produce the airtubes in the same manner.
.... The avarage Joe is not going to pay regular visits to the local fire department to get a refill, and the safety of your product should not rely on that.

.....

I really don't understand why people are okay with this.

OK, lets project "some" people's attitude to other examples from life:

- Audi for example recommends using 91 octane gas in their cars .... some people asking on the forums "can they fill 87?" and I would bet for a case of beer that there are people filling the $50K car with cheapest possible fuel. What to say about that warranty claim, because sooner or later will surface.
- in HomeDepot people shopping for some fancy dimmer switches and asking how to diy because the certified electrician bill is out of their mind. Guess what is first when the fireman arrives?
- in HD again people buying parts to connect the new barbecue to a house/residential gas line ... knowing that the Insurance Company will reject just anything if the project goes South.

And these story's goes on and on.

You buy an PCP airgun but expecting what exactly ? you will make some fun ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Airgun-hobbyist
if corrosion was indeed the root cause. and if. it was then as i mention prier almost all gun manufators now become a concern.

Yes. A very big "if".

Look at the page 5 of the report, I missed this part upon the initial reading.

There is no way we would see such thinning of the walls under normal operating pressures, corrosion or no corrosion. Not now when we know that the material of the reservoir is what it's supposed to be, and there are no metallurgical defects or evidence of metal fatigue. Yet, there is a thinning of the walls under tensile load.

I bet this is an overpressure event. Corrosion simply created a weak spot in an unusual place. Chances are, without it, it would've failed elsewhere.

Screenshot_20230902_164039.jpg


Or maybe someone did grab the rifle by the barrel and hit it hard against a tree, hitting it with the end of the air reservoir. That would also create tensile load at the base of the tube. :D
 
Last edited:
Thank you Ed for providing the findings. Not what I wanted to hear but it is what it is.

The sharp corner design is fine with me from a mechanical standpoint. I believe it is sound as far as just pressure is concerned.

The sharp corner from a corrosion standpoint is not. I have been studying the effects of stress corrosion cracking (scc). I have learned that higher stressed areas in the stronger aluminum alloys are highly susceptible to scc.

I am convinced that using clean/dry air will eliminate this being a concern. In my case however, I have already filled multiple times from a ‘cheap’ compressor. I use what is within my means for moisture removal but I am not confident I have always removed all the moisture. Since scc is not always easily detected (especially in this particular tube), I’m not convinced my tube is corrosion free.

As such, I will be taking this tube out of service, along with the lower tube which has same vulnerabilities.

I am not placing blame upon the manufacturer. I do not have a source for dry air locally and used what I felt at the time was sufficient.

I understand that all materials are susceptible to corrosion but it appears to me that this design SEEMS to be more susceptible. Due to the stress in that corner.

Be safe,
Dave
 
Thank you, guys, for all what you've written. Some of it (like "sharp corners) are so boring already based on what I've explained before that I have no intention to explain it one more time. And some of the ideas are interesting (right, the thiner wall shows that where was an explousure under higher pressure, much more higher than it should be, over the limit of the plastic deformation, and we have found that while tesing and exploding the tube with the pressure over 800 bar).

Anyhow, everything that has hapenned is just a combination of the curcamstances and factors which met in one time in one place. And no me, no owner of the gun can trace all those factors and find out what was wrong. That is just happened. I know that from my side everyting was made correctly and it proved by over 100 thousand guns made and sold for over 20 years of my work. So, Dave, no need to be afraid and stop using the toy. That can happen with anything in your life, from a car to to a plane which never stops you using all of it.

I am satisfied and breeth out with the sureness -- we are doing everything right, but it doesn't mean that we have to stop and relax, I consider the high pressure machines as potential dengerous and use them with the reasonable measures of safety.

All the best to you all and will meet you soon with our new toys :)

With the best regards

Ed
 
Thanks for sharing. It appears to be caused by operator error but corrosion due to poor air quality is certainly something that occurs on other products in the industry? Yet very few explosive failures are caused by corrosion in the industry? Lets hope there is nothing unique to the design of the L2 that makes it more susceptible to explode due to corrosion than other airguns. Considering the quantity of L2s in use we should know within a few years. Time will tell.

If anything, it is certainly a good reminder. Everyone should be aware of the potential for corrosion to compromise the safety of airguns. We should all be reminded that clean air and regular inspection should be a common practice to assure a safe operation of our airguns.

I always use extensively filtered air and will inspect my L2 on a regular basis. I feel comfortable to take it up to 300BAR again.

Right or wrong, the square corner on a machined pressure vessel still bothers me.
 
Since this is a single event it's reasonable to believe that 99% of mfg guns are structurally sound. I personally appreciate the open attitude that edgun has demonstrated with their analysis. Metal fatigue, corrosion, changes to the assembly weakening the structure are all something that we need to be reminded of I believe to continue to have a safe experience with high pressure devices.

Are their any manufacturers or other organizations that provide cost effective inspections on tanks like some motorcycle helmet manufacturers provide for their equipment?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BlackTitanium