I have two Bugbuster 3-9x scopes that were mounted on some guns I don't shoot very much and they work fine for what I paid for them, just barely over $100 delivered. I put one on my new Jet 2 for some testing but the mounting area is so small on the scope I can't get it far enough away from my eye to see the full image through the eyepiece. I had to mount it with both rings forward of the loading port because it won't bridge the gap across the loading port to the rear rail section.
I am looking at an Athlon Talos 4-16x or a Neos 4-12x to mount on the Jet 2. Both of them have enough mounting area to work. How do they compare to the Bugbuster as far as clarity? Both of my Bugbusters are definitely on the bottom of the clarity scale for all the scopes I own, but they work OK and hold a zero. If it would fit on the Jet I would probably keep it there. There are some times at 30+ yards that I wish I had more than 9x, so the higher magnification will be nice to have. The extra weight and size of the Athlons isn't a concern.
I am looking at an Athlon Talos 4-16x or a Neos 4-12x to mount on the Jet 2. Both of them have enough mounting area to work. How do they compare to the Bugbuster as far as clarity? Both of my Bugbusters are definitely on the bottom of the clarity scale for all the scopes I own, but they work OK and hold a zero. If it would fit on the Jet I would probably keep it there. There are some times at 30+ yards that I wish I had more than 9x, so the higher magnification will be nice to have. The extra weight and size of the Athlons isn't a concern.
Last edited: