I can share that I have had both the Midas Tac 6-24 and a Bushnell Forge 2.5-15x50 which I believe share in part the new design of the Match Pro. If that is the case and it has similar mechanicals as the Forge along with good glass I would say the Match Pro would be an excellent value. They are of similar weight (<=4oz) though the Midas is .6-1" longer. The glass in my Forge was superb along with a good eye box at 15x and nice DOF. The Forge was a SFP. I have since moved to FFP. The Athlon Midas Tac I thought was mechanically equal to the Bushnell but the IQ for me and my eye sensitivities started to degrade above 20x on the Midas Tac, just me. It has been returned. This comparison was done against my Ares ETR.
As we know everyone's eyes are different. These observations are my experience in my environment.
Being that the Bushnell Match Pro can only be purchased through Bushnell at this point and it runs $130-$300 less than a Midas Tac, it might be well worth the effort to test it against what you have now. Bushnell has a 30 return policy (you pay return). Enjoy your research.
Patrick