no."BayStYat"
Incorrect: Your statement might be right for a .22 but the OP said .25. My Cricket is "tuned" for 35 grain. It still has a lot more power available as the hammer spring is not even in 1 turn in from factory! The regulator can also be adjusted for more power. This is a very capable gun in the hands of an expert tuner like Earnest!"DEN54"
no."BayStYat"
It's too much weight 49gr. Cricket has no power for this bullet.
Tuning it is not realistic. Cricket for 25-30gr.
Be careful of one, you can break the draft of the cocking. There have been cases . In Russia there are several."T3PRanch"
Incorrect: Your statement might be right for a .22 but the OP said .25. My Cricket is "tuned" for 35 grain. It still has a lot more power available as the hammer spring is not even in 1 turn in from factory! The regulator can also be adjusted for more power. This is a very capable gun in the hands of an expert tuner like Earnest!"DEN54"
no."BayStYat"
It's too much weight 49gr. Cricket has no power for this bullet.
Tuning it is not realistic. Cricket for 25-30gr.
I will say that the bullet linked is too long for the Cricket Magazine so they would have to be hand loaded. (Mag is 10mm MAX, Bullet is about 12mm)
Bobs Boat Tail bullets (molds from NOE) in 41 Grain are the heaviest bullet that will fit the magazine. His 52 Grain Flat nose are just a touch too long and might cause indexing problems.
Thurmond
Those are valid concerns. The 1st concern can be eliminated by proper sizing of the slug and using nothing but pure lead plus a proper lead in for the breech end of the barrel."DEN54" Be careful of one, you can break the draft of the cocking. There have been cases . In Russia there are several.
Also for these bullets you need a barrel without a choke. Only in this case they will fly to the target.
The rifle body does not provide for the installation of good large hammer springs.