I kind of agree with you on that. This technology would deserve a full investment in the overall sophistication of the whole from the start. On the other hand, we are a very small company compared to FX for example. It produces what we have the possibilities for at the given moment and finance capital, since the company has never used any credit or involved investors.But I these guns like the M24 are kind of waste of knowledge. Not sure about the reliability of these guns but I think the construction and the valve are not so bad from the theoretical side.
Somewhat interesting description for a valve which, from a physical point of view and from real data, is the best that has ever been produced and due to the construction it will be very, very difficult to overcome, but I take your point of view
The point is that the most effective system can be achieved by maximally limiting the parasitic space between the valve and the projectile, and it is not much better to reduce this space more than when the wall of the valve directly presses on the projectile. At the same time high performance can be achieved maximum flow into the barrel. Well, here the hole for the barrel is always the size of the barrel, so again this hole cannot be enlarged any more.
if I didn't know that this is the best system that can be according to current knowledge, We wouldn't have invested tens of thousands of dollars to get panthets in the US.
thank you for this information, which has not yet reached us. I haven't had the chance to shoot with the new FX impacts with more power yet, but what he says makes sense.e. I have now and Impact with 800mm barrel and I need to tell you the M24 is much more stable and less hold sensitive during shooting with 40grain slugs. Not sure about the valve open times but I assume the M24 has a very low valve opening time as it has much less recoil than the Impact. Also for first I was like only 600mm of barrel? Yes the M24 with the 600mm is much less hold sensitive but maybe it could be more effective and use lower reg pressure and have higher shot count with a 700mm one.
The M24 valve opening speed is very fast (short time for full opening), as the pressure helps to open quickly, at the same time, thanks to this, the firing pin is very light and moves only 12mm when released.
At the same time, it is located exactly in the axis of the barrel and, best of all, it moves in the direction of recoil. So, again, an ideal design in all respects, even better than firearms, where the firing pin goes against the recoil.
So against FX impact it is something completely different and all these elements certainly contribute to a much calmer shot. On the other hand, you experienced this with the aforementioned bad plastic stock. When you experience the M24 in a robust aluminum chassis, the shooting experience is many times better.
LW is able to deliver a 700mm barrel to order, but it is also a matter of the fact that the M24 is built according to its real model and therefore also with regard to appearance and design, and M24 SWS firearms primarily had a barrel length of 600mm.
If you use a 700mm barrel, of course the performance will increase. We are talking here about 10-15 m/s for 40gr slugs.
We will deal with models with a longer barrel in concepts that will not be built directly according to some real model
Upvote 0