Hey Everyone,
Your trust is important to me, and it's occurred to me as of late that I may have some work to do validating aspects of my review process with the audience. Going forward, I'll be looking for opportunities to do a better job of transparently bolstering AEAC process & authenticity throughout my videos.
I began this new campaign
today!!! ... with the Kalibrgun I'm currently working through. Without breaking video stream, I made the 50 & 100 yard post-grouping walk down to the target with the primary camera for the eight groups I shot at 50 yards, and the two groups I shot at 100 yards.
My hopes are that new approaches like these added in key areas across AEAC may ease any feelings of doubt among those in audience finding themselves mistrusting of the information I work so hard to self-learn and share.
Also, if I can help with any questions, please feel free to ask me publicly in this thread.
I will respond with transparency.
Best,
Steve
P.S. what you see below is my usual behind the scenes learning & results process to ensure I'm bringing forth reliable information to the community. Huge hours go into testing & learning my way through the information by myself before I ultimately string a video together and share my distilled down conclusive findings... which as most of ya know, normally comes along with 3 groups at 50 yards and 1-2 groups at 100 yds (for PCPs). Always, I share the consistent average of my findings, never just the very best.
All day Friday and all day today learning the Kalibrgun..
. You have set you self apart for having such a high standard. Keep up the good work. Its not a sin to be compensated for your efforts in front of and behind the camera. 
. 
