I have researched that these 2 guns keep showing up in the top 2 , I selected these two as I'm intrigued with the underlever concept keeping the barrel aligned. Also, where did the HW 77 go? was it inferior? Discontinued? Or significantly less powerful than the HW97?
Ahhh the age old ...Tx200 vs HW97 question...(it's as old as history itself, Ford vs GM, and on and on)
I'm in the camp that owns both the TX200 and HW97 in 0.177 caliber.
I shoot WFTF piston.
I think the most important issue is accuracy.
Accuracy wise, I think it's a wash. More limited by shooter's ability vs the small groups these rifles can print.
For me as a WFTF competitor, the next issue is; can I trouble shoot this gun in the field/gun range with minimal tools (swap out the main spring, change the piston seal, service the breech seals....). For me the only answer for now is the TX200. Some of you younger weight lifters probably could field strip a 12 FPE HW 97 to get the main spring out and muscle it back in (with a multitool)...I'm too old and scrawny to try that.
Loading port I know is an issue for those with big paws but not an issue for me as I have small delicate hands and can load the TX blindfold. Which I learn to do early on (wasn't hard) as my big ass scope is right over the loading port.
Fit and finish and the glossy deep blue metal finish...Not an issue for me as this is a tool for competition. It's gonna get scratched up, bluing is going to wear off...etc. But if you want to buy this as an heirloom and spit and polish (and caress it everyday....shivers...) more power to you. Then buy the TX200.
The click click click of the loading port of the TX doesn't bother me too much. I'm going deaf anyways (that's what I tell my wife...honey, really I didn't hear what you said)
So that in a nutshell is how I ended up choosing and shooting the TX in competition. With my scores, it probably doesn't matter much what I shoot. Sigh...with my ability I could probably score higher throwing rocks at the target.