Tuning A tuning test for the experts

This is a test, ... if you had a pcp rifle, that produced a shot string with the following stats, what would be your determination?
Is this a well controlled string?
Is it considered a consistent string?
Would this be a good tune for....say 100 yd shooting?

The string
AVG 997 fps
MAX 1028 fps
MIN 989 fps
ES 41 fps
%ES 4.1 fps
STDEV 11.4 fps
 
  • Like
Reactions: Normkel
Without any information about the gun and projectile, I have zero input. If the gun isn’t regulated, you might be good. If you‘re shooting pellets with known weight consistency issues, your string will look much better if you weigh and sort. The speculation can go on but some more info would help immensely.
 
The info you provided was a shot string with a minimum and maximum FPS.
There is not a single person on this planet who can make predictions based on that.

Provide this info:
-airgun info (specs, regulated, barrel length, etc)
-pellet/slug weight on that shot string
-count in that shot string

Read these articles if you want to learn more about tuning PCPs:
The older articles will give you the foundation, the newer articles assume you already know stuff.

This article shows accuracy based on the extreme spread:
 
As mentioned above, not enough information to really help.

A 41 feet per second extreme spread in going to result in a substantial change in the point of impact at 100 yards from slowest to fastest shot. You can see the theoretical change in trajectory if you plug those numbers into a ballistic application (I use an old copy of ChairGun) to see that.

Such a large change in velocity would influence the stability of the projectile as well.

Cheers!
 
  • Like
Reactions: gendoc
Having owned and tested somewhere around a thousand airguns of all kinds in the last 65 years, including probably a couple-hundred unregulated PCPs, for good 100 yard results you want an extreme spread of no more than 25 FPS. Less is better, but a 25 FPS ES probably translates to about 1/2" at 100.

RR card copy.jpg
 
The info you provided was a shot string with a minimum and maximum FPS.
There is not a single person on this planet who can make predictions based on that.

Provide this info:
-airgun info (specs, regulated, barrel length, etc)
-pellet/slug weight on that shot string
-count in that shot string

Read these articles if you want to learn more about tuning PCPs:
The older articles will give you the foundation, the newer articles assume you already know stuff.

This article shows accuracy based on the extreme spread:
The over 11 fps stdev and 41 es, is your clue to the consistency of the string, which is horrible.
 
This was a review of a Red Wolf, and I agree that on target is the proof, BUT, with so much STDEV and ES, this is not a 100 yard rifle with this tune. The reviewer called this a "well controlled" string. I was just curious what other might think. I certainly realize that tuning can resolve some of this, but to say this is good is quite a stretch.

I've got FX rifles that almost never have ES over 10 fps or so, and stdev of something less than 2, many times less than one. Those same rifles will do just over moa at 100 yards IF I can do my part.

I also have an FX WC that I'm still fighting to get consistent, so they all can have issues :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: UDABEGGER
It doesn't look good but...

I'd have to see the whole string of velocities, did they include shots when they went off the back of the reg?

I can have a great string but then shoot the last two off the reg and have an easy 40fps drop after a 15fps drop, which would skew my ES if I left those in the string. So if my rifle gets 60 shots, shot 61 would be 15fps low and shot 62 would be 40fps low.

If they did this the string could be great until the last few shots and then suck.