A 2-question poll for PCPers

We all know that PCPs are complex, and relatively expensive, guns. For raw power, look elsewhere. They are fickle as well, and lend themselves to tuning. Frustration comes with the territory. So does satisfaction from great improvement achieved, often turning cheapo guns into smooth shooters. Who inhabits this world ?



1. What is your (former) profession:

o engineer or other technical profession 

o doctor or other medical profession 

o lawyer

o professional hunter

o environmentalist

o other



2. Break down your time tuning vs. Shooting:

o 80/20

o 50/50

o 20/80



The feral invasive parrots are shrieking with curiosity ...

🐦
 
1. Other

2. Shooting 99% / Tuning 1%. Other than adjusting the trigger, I shoot them as they come out the box. Barely have time to shoot, so tuning is not something I pursue. I run a string through the chrono to establish a baseline. Then I just shoot and keep shooting. When accuracy falls off clean barrel and go back to just shooting. It's been working for me so far.
 
Other and 95% shooting and 5% tuning. I have dreams of tearing a gun apart and adding this and that and making absolute magic but other than a few turns of a hammer spring, or adding a regulator I pretty much leave them alone. Now adding more crap than a air rifle has the right to have, yes that's me. My poor Hatsan has a 6x24x50 scope, open sights, bipod, green laser pointer, TKO silencer, and a sling. I can barely lift it up anymore. My family laughs when I drag it out to shoot. My wife always asks if I'm off to war again?
 
Engineer, probably less than 5% tuning. I think you have a faulty premise. *Some* PCPs are finicky, fidgety, individual, what have you, but there are some that are out-of-the-box, just shoot, reliable, and accurate. You can improve any of them, a little, with tuning, but they're so good already you may never want to. It's really more about what *you* want to do.

GsT