25 Yard Parallax and Sub 20 Yard Shooting?

I think it comes down to a few different factors. My NightForce SHV 5-20 has 25y min parallax. At 10-12y, the parallax translates to about 1.5" to 2" of variability for POA at minimum magnification. I have spent enough time with this scope to find the center within 1/4", at targets under 25y.

With all of that said, humane kills are going to come down to the shooter, the caliber and ammo that you're using. 
 
I don't think parralax is as much problem as realizing the over hold to be on target needed for close shots. I shoot the 17HMR with normal setting at 80-90 yards and 14x and shoot 10yard targets without reset because of timing, how long the target will set still. It's a blurry target but with a hold over from 1/2" to 2" I don't miss much. Now with the Crown same thing, except my zero is 50 rather than 100 yards.
 
With zoom scopes I have found when at lower magnification it’s not much of a problem but at higher it could be a problem. It also varies by scope.



When target distance is significantly less than the parallax setting, and you turn down the magnification on a high power scope, parallax error is often at its worst. Even when the clarity looks OK.

Try it. Turn down a high power scope to the lowest magnification. Put a target at 10yds but set your parallax wheel at 25yds. If you bob your head while viewing the target, you'll often see significant parallax error. 
 
The parallax “error” only becomes one if your head position is inconsistent.

Furthermore, parallaxed at 25 and target at 10 means that the holdover (most likely hold under in this case) has a -MUCH- greater influence than the crosshair being not exactly in plane...

The way I see it, it’s of course not optimal, but not really much of a problem if you can’t or won’t spend the money on a better scope.
 
The parallax “error” only becomes one if your head position is inconsistent.

Furthermore, parallaxed at 25 and target at 10 means that the holdover (most likely hold under in this case) has a -MUCH- greater influence than the crosshair being not exactly in plane...

The way I see it, it’s of course not optimal, but not really much of a problem if you can’t or won’t spend the money on a better scope.



"most likely hold under in this case" - Not true.

If zeroed at 10 yards, then there is no hold under. If zeroed at 25 yards, the 10 yard shot would require hold over.

In either case, if you are correctly zeroed, or you know the correct holdover to use, than holdover has NO influence. But parallax error does.

"The parallax “error” only becomes one if your head position is inconsistent." Not necessarily.

When you have incorrect parallax adjustment, a consistent head position is not enough. Your eye must also be optically centered. You can hold your head in the same position very time and you still might see the POA move as you change the parallax adjustment. That is an indication that your parallax adjustment is critical, and that your eye position, though maybe consistent, is not perfectly centered. I generally don't use a cheekweld, but I do use the correct parallax setting when I shoot. So I can shoot with any head position, and have no noticeable parallax error.
 
The parallax “error” only becomes one if your head position is inconsistent.

Furthermore, parallaxed at 25 and target at 10 means that the holdover (most likely hold under in this case) has a -MUCH- greater influence than the crosshair being not exactly in plane...

The way I see it, it’s of course not optimal, but not really much of a problem if you can’t or won’t spend the money on a better scope.



"most likely hold under in this case" - Not true.

If zeroed at 10 yards, then there is no hold under. If zeroed at 25 yards, the 10 yard shot would require hold over.

In either case, if you are correctly zeroed, or you know the correct holdover to use, than holdover has NO influence. But parallax error does.

"The parallax “error” only becomes one if your head position is inconsistent." Not necessarily.

When you have incorrect parallax adjustment, a consistent head position is not enough. Your eye must also be optically centered. You can hold your head in the same position very time and you still might see the POA move as you change the parallax adjustment. That is an indication that your parallax adjustment is critical, and that your eye position, though maybe consistent, is not perfectly centered. I generally don't use a cheekweld, but I do use the correct parallax setting when I shoot. So I can shoot with any head position, and have no noticeable parallax error.

You are correct on the holdover at 10y, Stupid mistake on my side...

With consistent head position I imply a consistent eye position. If that is achieved, then having the crosshair not in the same focal plane as the target does not really matter. (I’m not saying not to parallax, of course it is always better to rule out possible detrimental factors, but in this case the parallax is not adjustable to below 20y. And we’re not trying to win the $5000 EBR trophy, but we are trying to achieve a humane kill shot, so let’s say within 3/8th of an inch is acceptable enough.

Think of when you shoot with iron sights. Lining up the post/notch forces your head (and thus your eye...) position to be consistent, but the parallax error is huge. In fact it is so enormous that it is not even possible to get both the post and target in focus simultaneously! (The parallax error is literally the whole distance from post to target!). And yet accuracy with the ole iron sights can be extremely good too...