I have been testing slugs in a Lothar-walther barreled airgun and noticed for the same tune that a slug of .217 Dia. is slightly slower than a slug of .218 Dia. However at their best velocity for accuracy, the .217 Dia. wins every time. I believe this is due to the reduced ID of the choke liking the .217 Dia. better as it exits the barrel.
I wanted to see how the .218 interacted with the lands and grooves of the rifleling, so chambered a Slug and removed my barrel from the action to prevent accidental discharge. A gap between the slug and groove can clearly be seen, but is slightly smaller than the gap of the .217 slug by .0005. This tighter fit would be the reason for the more efficient use of air, which allows the velocity to be slightly higher.
This leads to my question and experiment.
https://www.airgunnation.com/topic/big-bore-airgun-deer-hunting-ammo-pro-tip-how-to-make-45-death-star-slugs/
I saw the video that copper slugs were coated to size them up for the Airforce Texan, and wonder if these lead slugs can be done in simular fashion. Something to help make the seal in the bore better, allowing a tune that reduces air consumption. while generating little drag on the projectile. In the video it seamed that the coating didn't interfere with anything and didn't leave debris inside the barrel, but may require more frequent cleaning of my baffles.
I just purchased a can of the coating and will do some testing with the .217 and see if this works. This might require use of a single shot tray to prevent the coating from being peeled of by a magazine before entering the barrel.
Any way I have 23 gr NSA's in .217 coming tomorrow, which I will do initial setup and testing on to get baseline data. Then when the graphite coating comes in I will see what if any benefits might be had.
https://www.greenpartstore.com/John-Deere-Graphite-Lubricant-TY25797.html
I wanted to see how the .218 interacted with the lands and grooves of the rifleling, so chambered a Slug and removed my barrel from the action to prevent accidental discharge. A gap between the slug and groove can clearly be seen, but is slightly smaller than the gap of the .217 slug by .0005. This tighter fit would be the reason for the more efficient use of air, which allows the velocity to be slightly higher.
This leads to my question and experiment.
https://www.airgunnation.com/topic/big-bore-airgun-deer-hunting-ammo-pro-tip-how-to-make-45-death-star-slugs/
I saw the video that copper slugs were coated to size them up for the Airforce Texan, and wonder if these lead slugs can be done in simular fashion. Something to help make the seal in the bore better, allowing a tune that reduces air consumption. while generating little drag on the projectile. In the video it seamed that the coating didn't interfere with anything and didn't leave debris inside the barrel, but may require more frequent cleaning of my baffles.
I just purchased a can of the coating and will do some testing with the .217 and see if this works. This might require use of a single shot tray to prevent the coating from being peeled of by a magazine before entering the barrel.
Any way I have 23 gr NSA's in .217 coming tomorrow, which I will do initial setup and testing on to get baseline data. Then when the graphite coating comes in I will see what if any benefits might be had.
https://www.greenpartstore.com/John-Deere-Graphite-Lubricant-TY25797.html