Search results for query: *

Agreed, don't think that most think FX is the only good gun out there. Mine lived up to my expectations and don't feel its over hyped based on what I've seen. I'm sure I'd be saying the same about a Red Wolf and a few others.

Simple question, non- complicated answer. Assuming non-competition, .22 cal. 18.1 JSB or FX pellets are the best compromise for me . Better in the wind than .177 and less bullet drop than .25.

Totally agree, unless retired, takes a lot of time and effort to find good tunes. When I ordered mine form UA I asked them to tune for .22 in 18.1 at 50 yd. target shooting and that's exactly what I received, shoots fantastic and wouldn't change a thing.

I shoot 18.1's at 50 and this gun is amazingly accurate if not too windy.

Already have HW97 that's perfect, wish I could by a walnut stock.

Carm is the best I have used

No feeding problems with my M3. That's not to say that I've mastered a tune for these.

Decided I want to stick to MOA like my other Arken Questions, please text 617.620.0648

This listing has been renewed

My new Impact FX/ M3 came w/ bottle is rated at 310 Bar and fill gauge goes to 300. Sticking to 250 for now wonder if any harm in going 280 or so?

My FX M3 arrived in perfect condition tonight and tuned to .22 18.13 JSB's by UA, which primarily what I shoot at the range. I can not believe how quiet this gun is! Filled to 250 bar and just dry firing w/ suppressor but wow. Not fair comparison but compared to my old Avenger I'm just amazed...

Bought by mistake, will trade for FX 18.1, 15.89 or JSB 18.13's

This looks like it may design flaw with this version. I'm guessing there is too much stress at the point where the tactical stock meets the receiver and the cast aluminum cannot handle.

IN

Agreed about Arken turrets and also great tracking. I also have an Anthlon 6- 24x 50 on my TX200. Both are great scopes for the price. I appreciate not needing to put on reading glasses like I do with the Hawke's I've had. I'm just not ready to spend $1000 plus until I'm as good as my $400...

Unfortunately, none today but tomorrow my HW 97 .117 with new Arken 4-16x 50 30 mm scope @ 50 yards.

Truth is, until I figured out how much more important Parallax adjustments were on these I thought 1st was defective. Now that I know, no problem, just wondered if this was the norm on FFP scopes in general

Yes, know about ocular adjustment and know how to initially set at any power but that's where the difference begins with my 2 FFP Scopes. Parallax adjustments much more critical on my FFP scopes compared to SFP. If that's normal no problem, just reaching out for more knowledge on the subject

Yup, welcome to post COVID inflation cycle. Its way worse in Europe than here. Will get better but will take time and prices won't necessarily go down.